Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #1036Re: MP3 Vs ATRAC : Which is worse ?
From: Ztry
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:00
16 lines
1451 bytes
1451 bytes
Under two kind are bad this conditions, Mp3 maybe better than Atrac in the record time with walking music. Still waiting for recorder in mp3 format with mini dise...................... Kit-pui Wong wrote in message <77bvje$q3o$3@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk>... >ATRAC (for MD) and MP3 are both irreversible data "compression" >algorithms. >Which one loses more data during "compression" ? >Which one gives worse audio result, theoretically and/or >practically ?? > >Thanks in advance ! >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<77d9nl$kje$1@imsp009a.netvigator.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<77bvje$q3o$3@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109f11,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public X-Google-Thread: 10ff83,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ff83,public X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public X-Google-Thread: 105a81,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public X-Google-Thread: f6728,8f9482d021558bd9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public From: "Ztry" <Ztry@worldserpent.com> Subject: Re: MP3 Vs ATRAC : Which is worse ? Date: 1999/01/12 Message-ID: <77d9nl$kje$1@imsp009a.netvigator.com> X-Deja-AN: 431291092 References: <77bvje$q3o$3@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Organization: Netvigator Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual,uk.rec.audio,tw.bbs.rec.audiophile