Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ????

Article View: rec.audio.tech

Article #1077

#1077

From: Arny Kr�ger
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 00:00

24 lines
2255 bytes

Lee HC wrote in message <01be2daf$fced7620$LocalHost@default>...
>
>
>Arny Kr�ger <arnyk@flash.net> wrote in article
>>
>> It's worse than that! All good CD players sound the same!
>>
>>
>> So why need expensive CD player is an even better question!
>
>
>Arny, are you joking ?
>


Not at all. There is no technical reason related to audible sound that
justifies expensive CD players. This has been pretty well laid out in the
public eye ever since publication of: "Do All CD Players Sound the Same?", Ian
G. Masters and D. L. Clark,   Stereo Review, January 1986,  pp.50-57, and
reiterated by
"6 Top CD Players: Can You Hear the Difference?", Ken C. Pohlmann,  Stereo
Review, December 1988,
pp.76-84.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <R5jg2.636$ok1.1124@news.flash.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <F308098DC0C8DC2F.31FD14AE39298D33.674812088DCBAA2A@library-proxy.airnews.net> <d6UPeXAfMmd2EwoM@heading.demon.co.uk> <1C5AE5CA0F2F9ADC.A0C451A2A5364D00.E599AFEBD487605B@library-proxy.airnews.net> <F45znB.9Bw@world.std.com> <9AC33C397E6F7EEC.EB514CB227F8BAFB.F49C9B9A4FBF795C@library-proxy.airnews.net> <z1ef2.322$S7.782@news.flash.net> <01be2daf$fced7620$LocalHost@default>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 109f11,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public
X-Google-Thread: f6728,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public
X-Google-Thread: 10ff83,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ff83,public
X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public
X-Google-Thread: 105a81,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public
From: "Arny Kr�ger" <arnyk@flash.net>
Subject: Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ????
Date: 1998/12/24
Message-ID: <R5jg2.636$ok1.1124@news.flash.net>
X-Deja-AN: 425404681
References: <753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <F308098DC0C8DC2F.31FD14AE39298D33.674812088DCBAA2A@library-proxy.airnews.net> <d6UPeXAfMmd2EwoM@heading.demon.co.uk> <1C5AE5CA0F2F9ADC.A0C451A2A5364D00.E599AFEBD487605B@library-proxy.airnews.net> <F45znB.9Bw@world.std.com> <9AC33C397E6F7EEC.EB514CB227F8BAFB.F49C9B9A4FBF795C@library-proxy.airnews.net> <z1ef2.322$S7.782@news.flash.net> <01be2daf$fced7620$LocalHost@default>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
X-Complaints-To: abuse@flash.net
X-Trace: news.flash.net 914472433 208.194.218.223 (Wed, 23 Dec 1998 22:07:13 CDT)
Organization: FlashNet Communications, http://www.flash.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 22:07:13 CDT
Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual,uk.rec.audio,tw.bbs.rec.audiophile

Reply to Parent Message