Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ????

Article View: rec.audio.tech

Article #1082

#1082

From: Andr� Huisman
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 00:00

28 lines
2508 bytes

Chung heeft geschreven in bericht <367f4153.21340362@news2.cyberec.com>...
>>who's to say the book in itself is corect? otherwise why would people
>>bother with 96khz or hdcd and all that?
>>
>>kent

>Good point...!!!   Kent........I belive my ear more than the theory.
>I Hate argue with them.  They belive theory more than ear.


Then do Arny's bittest. It does not say much about bandwidth (hey Arny, make
a Bandwidth test as well ;-) but it does say much about the necessity for
more than 16 bits.

You can make such a CD (using software like Cool Edit) yourself. It's only
then that you can start to "believe" your ears (after you've experienced
that they are pretty easy to fool).

If I have the time (next year ;-) I will make a CD of my own (according to
Arny's suggestion) but will add different Bandwidth's as well (starting from
say 12kHz upto 20kHz). Would be a nice Christmas present for High Endies
;-))

Andr� Huisman
New Line licht & geluid
newline@usa.net
http://www.xs4all.nl/~newline/
--- pardon my French, I'm Dutch ---

Technical Details

Message-ID: <75o437$sci$5@news2.xs4all.nl>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <F308098DC0C8DC2F.31FD14AE39298D33.674812088DCBAA2A@library-proxy.airnews.net> <d6UPeXAfMmd2EwoM@heading.demon.co.uk> <1C5AE5CA0F2F9ADC.A0C451A2A5364D00.E599AFEBD487605B@library-proxy.airnews.net> <F45znB.9Bw@world.std.com> <367C3063.31B20018@tdv.aus.org> <367f4153.21340362@news2.cyberec.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 109f11,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public
X-Google-Thread: f6728,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public
X-Google-Thread: 10ff83,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ff83,public
X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public
X-Google-Thread: 105a81,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public
From: "Andr� Huisman" <newline@usa.net>
Subject: Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ????
Date: 1998/12/22
Message-ID: <75o437$sci$5@news2.xs4all.nl>
X-Deja-AN: 424814718
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: dc2-modem2658.dial.xs4all.nl [194.109.138.98]
Sender: newline@dc2-modem2658.dial.xs4all.nl
References: <753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <F308098DC0C8DC2F.31FD14AE39298D33.674812088DCBAA2A@library-proxy.airnews.net> <d6UPeXAfMmd2EwoM@heading.demon.co.uk> <1C5AE5CA0F2F9ADC.A0C451A2A5364D00.E599AFEBD487605B@library-proxy.airnews.net> <F45znB.9Bw@world.std.com> <367C3063.31B20018@tdv.aus.org> <367f4153.21340362@news2.cyberec.com>
X-XS4ALL-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 13:42:15 CET
X-XS4ALL-User: newline
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Organization: New Line licht en geluid
Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual,uk.rec.audio,tw.bbs.rec.audiophile

Reply to Parent Message