🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #1112

Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ????

#1112
From: Bob Velkov
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 00:00
29 lines
2552 bytes
DPierce@world.std.com (Richard D Pierce) writes:

> In article <1C5AE5CA0F2F9ADC.A0C451A2A5364D00.E599AFEBD487605B@library-proxy.airnews.net>,
> Chung <kclee@hk.gin.net> wrote:
> >How the CD Transport could make sure the data is 100% corrected on
> >real time error correction.  Will it read again on error?  I don't
> >think so.
> >
> >So, this type of "error correction" could only provide
> >acceptable/reasonable approximated signal output.  I say it is not
> >error correction.  It is signal approximation only.
> >
> >May be Arny's suggestion, assisted by special software could make sure
> >error free.  But General CD reader could not.
> 
> Mr. Chung's conclusions and assertions are simply 100% wrong. Normal audio
> CD has very sophisticated real time error detection AND correction
> algorithms in place nd has since it was first introduced. He says it is
> not error correction, yet he has NO idea what he is tlking about. He
> mistakes error correction (which is in place on ALL reads from ALL CD's by
> EVERY CD player in existance) with error concealment (which is ONLY in
> place if ALL the error correction breaks down).

Very good said, yeah! 


-- 
Bob Velkov
Bob.Velkov@par.univie.ac.at 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <xajbtl0eo5s.fsf@par.univie.ac.at>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <F308098DC0C8DC2F.31FD14AE39298D33.674812088DCBAA2A@library-proxy.airnews.net> <d6UPeXAfMmd2EwoM@heading.demon.co.uk> <1C5AE5CA0F2F9ADC.A0C451A2A5364D00.E599AFEBD487605B@library-proxy.airnews.net> <F45znB.9Bw@world.std.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109f11,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public
X-Google-Thread: f6728,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public
X-Google-Thread: 10ff83,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ff83,public
X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public
X-Google-Thread: 105a81,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public
From: Bob Velkov <bob@par.univie.ac.at>
Subject: Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ????
Date: 1998/12/19
Message-ID: <xajbtl0eo5s.fsf@par.univie.ac.at>
X-Deja-AN: 423842567
References: <753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <F308098DC0C8DC2F.31FD14AE39298D33.674812088DCBAA2A@library-proxy.airnews.net> <d6UPeXAfMmd2EwoM@heading.demon.co.uk> <1C5AE5CA0F2F9ADC.A0C451A2A5364D00.E599AFEBD487605B@library-proxy.airnews.net> <F45znB.9Bw@world.std.com>
X-Complaints-To: news-adm@news.univie.ac.at
X-Trace: www.univie.ac.at 914042684 112706 131.130.186.23 (19 Dec 1998 04:44:44 GMT)
Organization: Vienna University, Austria
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Dec 1998 04:44:44 GMT
Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual,uk.rec.audio,tw.bbs.rec.audiophile