Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #1124Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ????
From: Arny Kr�ger
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 00:00
10 lines
1543 bytes
1543 bytes
Kit-pui Wong wrote in message <753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk>... >Some people with "golden ears" claim that there are great >differences between an original CD and its digital CDR copy. Claims are like a soiled crapper. Anybody can make one, but its no biggie. One flush and its gone! Claims with decent support are the only thing that is really worth checking out.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ajbd2.1945$Bc5.4115@news.flash.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109f11,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public X-Google-Thread: f6728,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public X-Google-Thread: 10ff83,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ff83,public X-Google-Thread: 105a81,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public From: "Arny Kr�ger" <arnyk@flash.net> Subject: Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ???? Date: 1998/12/14 Message-ID: <ajbd2.1945$Bc5.4115@news.flash.net> X-Deja-AN: 422176223 References: <753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@flash.net X-Trace: news.flash.net 913654086 208.194.215.31 (Mon, 14 Dec 1998 10:48:06 CDT) Organization: FlashNet Communications, http://www.flash.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 10:48:06 CDT Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual,uk.rec.audio,tw.bbs.rec.audiophile