🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #1126

Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ????

#1126
From: Martin Ackroyd
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 00:00
27 lines
2174 bytes
Brendan Heading wrote:
> 
> In article <753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk>, Kit-pui Wong
> <kpwong@psy.cuhk.edu.hk> writes
> >Some people with "golden ears" claim that there are great
> >differences between an original CD and its digital CDR copy.
> 
> In theory, no, there should be no difference. The definitive way to
> prove this is to first make a copy of a CD, and then get a favourite CD
> player and hook the digital output up to a computer with a digital input
> (SP/DIF etc). Then sample both the copy and the original and get the
> computer to do a comparison.
> 
> I reckon you'll find that they're 99% similar.
>

I saw a posting on an audio newsgroup a couple of years
back when someone was testing the benefits of green ink
or whatever.  He did a bitwise comparison.

He stated that there was a difference of *not one
single binary digit* in the whole CD, when played with
and without snake oil.  [A one percent error in digital 
electronics would be regarded as severe malfunction]

Cheers,
Martin
Technical Details
Message-ID: <367551ED.6E6CB492@virgin.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <7582eFA8uVd2Ewdq@heading.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public
X-Google-Thread: f6728,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public
X-Google-Thread: 109f11,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public
X-Google-Thread: 10ff83,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ff83,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public
X-Google-Thread: 105a81,48d41a4dac9741b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public
From: Martin Ackroyd <martin.ackroyd@virgin.net>
Subject: Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ????
Date: 1998/12/14
Message-ID: <367551ED.6E6CB492@virgin.net>
X-Deja-AN: 422266379
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <7582eFA8uVd2Ewdq@heading.demon.co.uk>
To: Brendan Heading <brendan@NOSPAMheading.demon.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: at home
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: martin.ackroyd@virgin.net
Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual,uk.rec.audio,tw.bbs.rec.audiophile