🚀 go-pugleaf

Harry Lavo wrote:
> 
> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message
> news:42dd83fa@news.comindico.com.au...
> >
> >snip<

> > "Howard Ferstler" <ferstle@attglobal.net> wrote in message
> > news:42DC1880.E6831157@attglobal.net...

> > I hate to sound like a subjectivist, but the stuff sounded
> > the same. Oops, a subjectivist would have claimed that they
> > sounded different, with a favored model having all sorts of
> > mesmerizing sound qualities. Yeah, I am a subjectivist down
> > deep, but unlike most other subjectivists I am not deluded.

> This is rich!  Howard claims he is a subjectivist.  

Yep. I do a bit of objective work, of course, but the bottom
line easily visible in all of my product reviews is
subjectivism.

> But since God gave him
> the power to read minds, he knows that HE is a rationale, careful listener.

No. Rather, unlike glassy-eyed, puffed-up tweakos whose
worlds revolve around their exotic audio systems, I consider
an audio system as a means to an end, and do not become
enamored of exotic and overkill products that do nothing
more than suck money out of wallets.

> However, the rest of we subjectivists are simply deluded.  

No doubt.

> How does he know?

One need only spend a bit of time here to see the proof put
forth for all to read.

> How does Howard ever know?  Those who read his posts KNOW he reads minds.

Actually, those with limited intellect probably do believe
that people with insight claim to be able to read minds.
Insight is something fools have problems understanding.

> They also know his mindreading is always off by 180 degrees.  Everything he
> thinks he knows about others is wrong!   Everything he thinks he knows about
> himself is wrong!

Get a life, tweako.

> Howard is the original "Wrong Way Corrigan" when it comes to understanding
> this hobby.

Well, I do understand that the high-end contingent is mostly
(not entirely, but mostly) populated by freaks. I understand
this hobby well enough to realize just how goofy and
psychologically inadequate some of the participants happen
to be.

Howard Ferstler