🚀 go-pugleaf

Trevor Wilson wrote:
> 
> "Howard Ferstler" <ferstle@attglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:42D4413F.73CB6DB5@attglobal.net...
> > Clyde Slick wrote:

> >> And the abx test removes our expectations, yet leaves their expectations
> >> in.
> >> It is a more biased test than subjective listening!!!
> >> ABX is hideously flawed.

> > ....to those who are weak of mind and in need of the
> > ineffable.
 
> **Is that opposed to retired librarians who refuse to listen to those with
> real technical qualifications and abilities? 

At least I am not a low-life con artist who sells people a
bill of goods when it comes to the so-called sound of
upscale amps and exotic wires.

> Is that opposed to retired
> librarians who imagine that a short circuit offers zero Ohms resistance? 

Close enough to zero to essentially shunt all of an amp's
audible output around the speaker load and shut the amp
down.

> Is
> that opposed to retired librarians who have no idea how the protection
> systems operate in domestic (or any other) amplifiers? 

At least I do not claim that one's own, specially built
amplifier has mysterious qualities that make it sound better
than other, decently built versions.

> Is that opposed to
> retired librarians who have no understanding of Thevenin's Theorem?

At least I do not claim that exotic speaker wires have an
audible advantage over thick lamp cord. At least I do not
con people into believing the audio equivalent of the tooth
fairy.

> You and your comments lack any kind of credibility. 

This, from a guy who claims that his special amp (or one
that he sells, since I do not believe he designed it) has
qualities that set it apart from all other decently designed
versions. Yeah, it may sound different, but if so that is
because there is something seriously wrong with it.

> Go study up on the Dewey
> Decimal System (or whatever is used in libraries now) and get back to us.

Why on earth would you want to learn about a library
cataloging system that went out of date decades ago? 

> Even better, you could actually learn some circuit analysis and engage in
> some practical experience and get back to us. Of course, you could always
> admit your error and apologise to those who actually understand. 

About amps and wires? Is that supposed to be you?

Howard Ferstler