Re: DRM -Ain't- IBOC

Article View: rec.audio.tech

Article #507

#507

From: RHF
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:51

41 lines
3773 bytes

On Oct 13, 9:13 am, SFTV_troy <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> RHF wrote:
> > On Oct 12, 8:52 am, SFTV_troy <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > RHF wrote:
> > > > > On Oct 11, 5:48 am, SFTV_troy
>
> > > > > - There's no real difference between DRM's version
> > > > > - (sitting next-to the AM signal) and HD's version
> > > > > - (also sitting next-to the AM signal).
>
> > > > IBOC AM/MW "HD" Radio - Hybrid Mode
> > > >http://www.dallas.net/~jvpoll/rfi/AM620_KMKI/AM_IBOC_Mask10.gif
> > > > - Lower Digital Sidebands {Co-SideBand}
> > > > * Analog Host Signal (Mono) {Nested}
> > > > + Upper Digital Sidebands {Co-SideBand}
>
> > - Thanks for proving my point.  HD sits *next to* the AM signal (+/-
>
> > - 10 kHz).  Same as DRM sits *next to* the AM signal  (+/- 10 kHz).
>
> > DRM = Simulcast without Specification {Sans-Mask}
> > x x x Does Not Equal x x x
> > IBOC = Intrinsic {Mask} : Nested Analog + Two Digital Co-Sidebands
>

= I still don't see the difference.  Both standards are using
sidebands,
= adjacent to the analog AM signal.

SFTV - There you go again one more time being Factually Wrong
-and- Clearly Misstating the Technical Specifications.

DRM = Simulcast without Specification {Sans-Mask}
-Note- That is Two 'separate' Signals -NOT- Sidebands
x x x Does Not Equal x x x
IBOC = Intrinsic {Mask} : Nested Analog + Two Digital Co-Sidebands
http://electronicdesign.com/Files/29/12194/Figure_02.gif


i b oc'd ~ RHF
 .

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1192315864.745222.110810@v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References:

<1191201354.812168.82840@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <fdrf0l$tb8$1@registered.motzarella.org> <1191324370.137789.13750@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1191367070.722183.304380@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1191412958.156924.149200@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <470434d7$0$227$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <1191508280.215104.47160@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1191628632.480985.29890@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1191950205.808493.159200@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <KKOOi.56141$Um6.22827@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net> <1192106620.792281.302790@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1192128684.702170.83780@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1192176680.361661.174840@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <1192204332.149978.315570@t8g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <1192239607.418288.111170@v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <1192292013.097961.57070@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,75377a07268430fc
X-Google-Thread: 10a749,75377a07268430fc
X-Google-Thread: 114aac,75377a07268430fc
X-Google-Thread: f7d8a,2fbc1cad392d0236
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,gid10a749,gid114aac,gidf7d8a,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From:  RHF <rhf-newsgroups@pacbell.net>
Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
Subject: Re: DRM -Ain't- IBOC
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:51:04 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <1192315864.745222.110810@v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
References: <1191201354.812168.82840@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
   <fdrf0l$tb8$1@registered.motzarella.org>
   <1191324370.137789.13750@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
   <1191367070.722183.304380@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
   <1191412958.156924.149200@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
   <470434d7$0$227$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
   <1191508280.215104.47160@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
   <1191628632.480985.29890@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
   <1191950205.808493.159200@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
   <KKOOi.56141$Um6.22827@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net>
   <1192106620.792281.302790@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
   <1192128684.702170.83780@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
   <1192176680.361661.174840@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
   <1192204332.149978.315570@t8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
   <1192239607.418288.111170@v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
   <1192292013.097961.57070@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.133.178.35
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1192315865 19656 127.0.0.1 (13 Oct 2007 22:51:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:51:05 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1192292013.097961.57070@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; YPC 3.2.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.133.178.35;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0

Reply to Parent Message