Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #513Re: DRM -Ain't- IBOC
From: RHF
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:06
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:06
70 lines
4110 bytes
4110 bytes
On Oct 11, 11:53 am, RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Oct 11, 5:48 am, SFTV_troy <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > RHF wrote:
> > > On Oct 9, 10:13 am, SFTV_troy <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > Hein ten Horn wrote:
> > > > > SFTVratings_t...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > > > > > Okay. By that reasoning, because HD Radio sits "next to" the AM
> > > > > > signal, then it is not IBOC either. It is a simulcast format.
> > > > > > Do you agree with that statement?
>
> > > > > As a whole? No.
>
> > > - There is no technical difference.
> > > - Both HD radio and DRM operate on the same principles:
> > > - 2 separate signals
> > > - 1 analog
> > > - 1 digital
> > > - the digital is simulcast "next to" the original analog signal
>
> > > iBquity's IBOC Broadcast System is 'Intrinsic'
> > > DRM's Simulcast Broadcast Scheme is NOT 'Intrinsic'
>
> - That distinction is more about FAITH, than reality.
>
> - There's no real difference between DRM's version
> - (sitting next-to the AM signal) and HD's version
> - (also sitting next-to the AM signal).
>
- SFTV,
-
- BLATANTLY TECNICALLY WRONG !
- ARE YOU SURE YOU ARE AN "EE" ?
-
- us lesser beings would like proof ~ RHF
- .
SFTV,
IBOC AM/MW "HD" Radio - Hybrid Mode
http://www.dallas.net/~jvpoll/rfi/AM620_KMKI/AM_IBOC_Mask10.gif
- Lower Digital Sidebands {Co-SideBand}
* Analog Host Signal (Mono) {Nested}
+ Upper Digital Sidebands {Co-SideBand}
-Note- The IBOC Signa supports the current AM Mono Signal as well as
the Digital {IBOC} Signal. Provides for 40kbps Data Rate, for Full
Stereo plus a Low Speed Data Path. Audio 36kbps, Song Title and Artist
4kbps .
http://www.rthk.org.hk/about/digitalbroadcasting/DSBS/ABU_AIR_2003/ses1_files/frame.htm#slide0143.htm
.
intrinsic, Intrinsic. INTRINSIC ! ~ RHF
http://electronicdesign.com/Files/29/12194/Figure_02.gif
.
>
> -
> - Neither sits their digital signal on-top of the AM!
> - That would not work.
> - Duh.
> .- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1192176386.911562.123980@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1191201354.812168.82840@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <fdrf0l$tb8$1@registered.motzarella.org> <1191324370.137789.13750@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1191367070.722183.304380@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1191412958.156924.149200@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <470434d7$0$227$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <1191508280.215104.47160@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <4706b322$0$229$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <1191949982.216610.266170@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1191955760.211361.121080@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1192106899.683070.284770@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1192128806.010233.226360@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,75377a07268430fc X-Google-Thread: 10a749,75377a07268430fc X-Google-Thread: 114aac,75377a07268430fc X-Google-Thread: f7d8a,2fbc1cad392d0236 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,gid10a749,gid114aac,gidf7d8a,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: RHF <rhf-newsgroups@pacbell.net> Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast Subject: Re: DRM -Ain't- IBOC Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:06:26 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 72 Message-ID: <1192176386.911562.123980@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com> References: <1191201354.812168.82840@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <fdrf0l$tb8$1@registered.motzarella.org> <1191324370.137789.13750@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1191367070.722183.304380@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1191412958.156924.149200@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <470434d7$0$227$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <1191508280.215104.47160@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <4706b322$0$229$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <1191949982.216610.266170@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1191955760.211361.121080@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1192106899.683070.284770@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1192128806.010233.226360@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.110.77.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1192176387 30425 127.0.0.1 (12 Oct 2007 08:06:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:06:27 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1192128806.010233.226360@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; YPC 3.2.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.110.77.0; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0