Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #523Re: DRM -Ain't- IBOC
From: RHF
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:53
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:53
42 lines
3208 bytes
3208 bytes
On Oct 11, 5:48 am, SFTV_troy <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote: > RHF wrote: > > On Oct 9, 10:13 am, SFTV_troy <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Hein ten Horn wrote: > > > > SFTVratings_t...@yahoo.com wrote: > > > > > > Okay. By that reasoning, because HD Radio sits "next to" the AM > > > > > signal, then it is not IBOC either. It is a simulcast format. > > > > > Do you agree with that statement? > > > > > As a whole? No. > > > - There is no technical difference. > > - Both HD radio and DRM operate on the same principles: > > - 2 separate signals > > - 1 analog > > - 1 digital > > - the digital is simulcast "next to" the original analog signal > > > iBquity's IBOC Broadcast System is 'Intrinsic' > > DRM's Simulcast Broadcast Scheme is NOT 'Intrinsic' > - That distinction is more about FAITH, than reality. - There's no real difference between DRM's version - (sitting next-to the AM signal) and HD's version - (also sitting next-to the AM signal). SFTV, BLATANTLY TECNICALLY WRONG ! ARE YOU SURE YOU ARE AN "EE" ? us lesser being would like proof ~ RHF . - - Neither sits their digital signal on-top of the AM! - That would not work. - Duh. .
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1192128806.010233.226360@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1191201354.812168.82840@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <fdrf0l$tb8$1@registered.motzarella.org> <1191324370.137789.13750@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1191367070.722183.304380@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1191412958.156924.149200@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <470434d7$0$227$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <1191508280.215104.47160@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <4706b322$0$229$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <1191949982.216610.266170@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1191955760.211361.121080@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1192106899.683070.284770@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,75377a07268430fc X-Google-Thread: 10a749,75377a07268430fc X-Google-Thread: 114aac,75377a07268430fc X-Google-Thread: f7d8a,2fbc1cad392d0236 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,gid10a749,gid114aac,gidf7d8a,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: RHF <rhf-newsgroups@pacbell.net> Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast Subject: Re: DRM -Ain't- IBOC Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:53:26 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 43 Message-ID: <1192128806.010233.226360@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> References: <1191201354.812168.82840@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <fdrf0l$tb8$1@registered.motzarella.org> <1191324370.137789.13750@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1191367070.722183.304380@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1191412958.156924.149200@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <470434d7$0$227$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <1191508280.215104.47160@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <4706b322$0$229$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <1191949982.216610.266170@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1191955760.211361.121080@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <1192106899.683070.284770@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.110.77.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1192128806 7033 127.0.0.1 (11 Oct 2007 18:53:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:53:26 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1192106899.683070.284770@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; YPC 3.2.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.110.77.0; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0