🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <20071006-213626.531.0@Robert-Orban.news-west.giganews.com>,
 Robert Orban <donotreply@spamblock.com> wrote:

> In article <telamon_spamshield-
> C3B8C2.22455204102007@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>, 
> telamon_spamshield@pacbell.net.is.invalid says...
> >
> >
> >In article <KJudnZ1Y2vgpFJjanZ2dnUVZ_vvinZ2d@giganews.com>,
> > Robert Orban <donotreply@spamblock.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <telamon_spamshield-
> >> FE4A4A.19085230092007@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>, 
> >> telamon_spamshield@pacbell.net.is.invalid says...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >In article <7HXLi.1757$hI7.459@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net>,
> >> > "David Eduardo" <david@davideduardo.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Telamon" <telamon_spamshield@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote in 
> message 
> >> >> news:telamon_spamshield-
> >> ACA06D.17572930092007@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> That's funny, I just asked Bob if he 'found' this and he 
> >> >> >> said no way, that you're basically just making shit up off 
> >> >> >> the top of your head.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Bob didn't test all the different model radios.
> >> >> >
> >> >> 
> >> >> He tested enough for a reliable sample of what Americans use. 
> >> >> I'm guessing you don't know who Bob Orban is, so you might 
> >> >> google him and the term Optimod or NRSC to learn a little bit 
> >> >> about the man who reinvented audio processing. 
> >> >
> >> >Yep, that where you got stuck somehow.
> >> >
> >> >Reality = Take some samples + apply statistics + shake vigorously
> >> >
> >> >Oops! It's not quite what you wanted. Try again.
> >> >
> >> >Reality = Makeup some samples + apply statistics + shake 
> >> vigorously
> >> >
> >> >Looking good.
> >> 
> >> This study, which was done under auspices of the NRSC (of which I 
> >> am only one member) was done very carefully. See 
> >> http://www.nrscstandards.org/ and click "AM Bandwidth Study." 
> >> 
> >> >Telamon Ventura, California
> >> 
> >> By the way, "Telemon," to whom am I actually speaking? If you are 
> >> implying that the above referenced study was corrupt, I would hope 
> >> that you would at least back up your accusation by letting us know 
> >> your real name and what evidence you have that the study was 
> >> flawed.
> >
> >The only suggestion I have for you Mr. Orban is to work on your 
> > reading comprehension. The handle is Telamon.
> 
> I don't care what your handle is. I care what your real-world 
> identity is. I have posted under mine.
> 
> If you choose to slander the work of the NRSC AM Bandwidth Working 
> Group while hiding your identity, then welcome to my killfile.

What part of the thread do you think belongs to you before you butted 
in? My comments strictly pertained to Eduardo until you decided to be 
part of the thread. My comments on statistics pertain to the marketing 
drivel he continually posts.

That's a big chip on your shoulder Bob.

-- 
Telamon
Ventura, California