Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #598Re: HD RADIO is no worse than DAB or DRM radio
From: Robert Orban
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:06
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:06
47 lines
3515 bytes
3515 bytes
In article <1191197905.161028.251110@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>, SFTVratings_troy@yahoo.com says... > > >David Eduardo wrote: >> <SFTVratings_troy@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> > >> > >> > >> > There are millions of obsolete televisions which will stop working in >> > just over a year. Does it look like the advertisers care? >> > They won't care about obsolete radios either. >> > >> >> Radio stations are not ready to go all digital, and probably will not be for >> 8 to 10 years.... if ever. > > > >Both the UK and Germany have "tentatively" set 2015 as the shut-down >for FM. (They expect DAB to fill that role.) I figure the U.S. >transition will require a similar time period of fifteen years, so >sometime around 2020 will be the end of analog. > >Although, I'd like to see AM die as early as 2010 since so few people >listen to it. Just make it pure digital, 10 kHz per channel. > >FM can continue until 2020 (it has no interference problems). FM can continue forever because, unlike the digital television transition in the US, HD Radio required no new spectrum and there is no proposal to auction off any of the current FM band (88-108 MHz in the US). I know of no serious broadcaster who claims to have any real idea of when analog FM might be shut down. If this ever occurs, it will probably be because other transmission channels finally provide a cheaper pipe to the listener and that pipe reaches enough listeners to make the loss of analog-only listeners inconsequential. FM in the US tends to use high powered transmitters with concurrent large electric bills. Digital transmission can get equivalent reach with much lower power -- power efficiency is probably close to 100x in favor of state of the art digital coding. Meanwhile, the cost of electricity is likely to continue to increase, at least in the medium term. (If the world ever gets practical fusion reactors, that trend could of course change :-). Bob Orban
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MvWdnS0M_q03EJjanZ2dnUVZ_v6rnZ2d@giganews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<1191065666.205537.159420@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1191197905.161028.251110@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,428391383e1324a5 X-Google-Thread: 10a749,428391383e1324a5 X-Google-Thread: 114aac,cd4ad6cadcf2b245 X-Google-Thread: f7d8a,cd4ad6cadcf2b245 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,gid10a749,gid114aac,gidf7d8a,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:04:42 -0500 Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast Subject: Re: HD RADIO is no worse than DAB or DRM radio From: Robert Orban <donotreply@spamblock.com> Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:06:06 -0800 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12S (x86 32bit) References: <1191065666.205537.159420@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1191197905.161028.251110@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-ID: <MvWdnS0M_q03EJjanZ2dnUVZ_v6rnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 48 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-SpjskMGem0W9lZIGo0Zfh0mdT/1Xq4bmDUgLdiXKGTUON75YPSMi4XNXkE/czbaj/BKYPa7SVnbEGlH!rTvLODDPF8XMAFLgSXgQru8OyQIRUh2nbYUze2hQmK2fpMOiHTv+oyCg3fugJNvHefXTXLurhQ== X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.35