Re: HD RADIO is no worse than DAB or DRM radio

Article View: rec.audio.tech

Article #746

#746

From: PocketRadio
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:53

20 lines
2626 bytes

On Sep 29, 4:42?pm, Ken <_ken...@telia.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:09:45 -0700, SFTV_troy <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Frankly I'm a bit surprised at the reaction. There's currently a
> > transition from analog to digital broadcasting (both in American and
> > the European Union), and there will be some growing pains, but it's
> > only temporary. In the LONG TERM, the digital radio will provide
> > better sound than the current analog (like upgrading FM Stereo
> > to 300 kbps Surround).
>
> No, they are going to increase quantity (more radio channels),
> not sound quality.  Se how they done in UK.

Consumer interest in DAB in the UK is slowing (only 3.5 million DAB
radios have been sold in ten years), DAB stalled in Canada, and there
is almost zero consumer interest in HD Radio in the US - consumers
must realize that digital radio is a farce:

http://hdradiofarce.blogspot.com/

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1191192787.895535.244560@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References:

<1191065666.205537.159420@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1191096585.135753.167530@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <00etf3devgvia4rlu0dv323e596rpras51@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,428391383e1324a5
X-Google-Thread: 10a749,428391383e1324a5
X-Google-Thread: 114aac,cd4ad6cadcf2b245
X-Google-Thread: f7d8a,cd4ad6cadcf2b245
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,gid10a749,gid114aac,gidf7d8a,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From:  PocketRadio@gmail.com
Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
Subject: Re: HD RADIO is no worse than DAB or DRM radio
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:53:07 -0000
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <1191192787.895535.244560@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
References: <1191065666.205537.159420@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <1191096585.135753.167530@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
   <00etf3devgvia4rlu0dv323e596rpras51@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.116.76
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1191192788 21269 127.0.0.1 (30 Sep 2007 22:53:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:53:08 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <00etf3devgvia4rlu0dv323e596rpras51@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 9.0; Windows 98),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.0 (Velocity/1.1.1 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1 spider-dtc-tf08.proxy.aol.com[CDBC70A8] (Prism/1.2.1), HTTP/1.1 cache-dtc-ab12.proxy.aol.com[CDBC744C] (Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM])
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=205.188.116.76;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0

Reply to Parent Message