Re: MP3 Vs ATRAC : Which is worse ?

Article View: rec.audio.tech

Article #999

#999

From: SimGraphics
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 00:00

13 lines
1193 bytes

In article <F6LBJt.xB@research.att.com>,
jj, curmudgeon and tiring philalethist <jj@research.att.com> wrote:
>Why not use MPEG-2 AAC,

Hello jj!

Where can I get a reasonably state-of-the-art AAC t/f encoder?
The encoder in refsoft* is lame, even according to the authors.
Something equivalent to l3enc or mp3enc from FIIS?

Thanks in advance,

Sylvester

Technical Details

Message-ID: <simgF6LI2x.5xr@netcom.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <77bvje$q3o$3@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <799d94$670$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <F6LBJt.xB@research.att.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109f11,8f9482d021558bd9
X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public
X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,8f9482d021558bd9
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,8f9482d021558bd9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public
X-Google-Thread: 105a81,8f9482d021558bd9
X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public
From: simg@netcom.com (SimGraphics)
Subject: Re: MP3 Vs ATRAC : Which is worse ?
Date: 1999/02/03
Message-ID: <simgF6LI2x.5xr@netcom.com>
X-Deja-AN: 440310025
Sender: simg@netcom17.netcom.com
References: <77bvje$q3o$3@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk> <799d94$670$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <F6LBJt.xB@research.att.com>
Organization: SimGraphics Engineering, South Pasadena, California
Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual

Reply to Parent Message