Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #1075Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ????
From: Lee HC
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 00:00
29 lines
2217 bytes
2217 bytes
John Woodgate <jmw@jmwa.demon.co.uk> wrote in article <s+C3BBAV7Ag2EwGz@jmwa.demon.co.uk>... > In a most apposite and timely article <01be2daf$fced7620$LocalHost@defa > ult>, Lee HC <leehc@glink.net.hk> contributes to the sum of human > endeavour > > > >Arny KrοΏ½ger <arnyk@flash.net> wrote in article > >> > >> It's worse than that! All good CD players sound the same! > > > >Arny, are you joking ? > > No, of course not. He's just *defined* a 'good' CD player as 'one that > sounds the same as some others that I regard as good. John, I would agree if Arny mentioned: 1. All "ideal" CD players sound the same! or 2. All "good" CD player sound the "similar" as good. Then the question are: 1. Any possibility of "ideal" CD players? 2. How to ensure an "ideal" CD players performed ideally in domestic setting. Then, who need "ideal" CD players? Lee HC
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<01be2e67$86956740$LocalHost@default>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk><F308098DC0C8DC2F.31FD14AE39298D33.674812088DCBAA2A@library-proxy.airnews.net><d6UPeXAfMmd2EwoM@heading.demon.co.uk><1C5AE5CA0F2F9ADC.A0C451A2A5364D00.E599AFEBD487605B@library-proxy.airnews.net><F45znB.9Bw@world.std.com><9AC33C397E6F7EEC.EB514CB227F8BAFB.F49C9B9A4FBF795C@library-proxy.airnews.net><z1ef2.322$S7.782@news.flash.net> <01be2daf$fced7620$LocalHost@default> <s+C3BBAV7Ag2EwGz@jmwa.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 109f11,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public X-Google-Thread: 10ff83,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ff83,public X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,public X-Google-Thread: 105a81,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid105a81,public X-Google-Thread: f6728,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,48d41a4dac9741b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public From: "Lee HC" <leehc@glink.net.hk> Subject: Re: Audio quality of CDR, any theory ???? Date: 1998/12/23 Message-ID: <01be2e67$86956740$LocalHost@default> X-Deja-AN: 425144079 References: <753ar1$p8u$1@justice.csc.cuhk.edu.hk><F308098DC0C8DC2F.31FD14AE39298D33.674812088DCBAA2A@library-proxy.airnews.net><d6UPeXAfMmd2EwoM@heading.demon.co.uk><1C5AE5CA0F2F9ADC.A0C451A2A5364D00.E599AFEBD487605B@library-proxy.airnews.net><F45znB.9Bw@world.std.com><9AC33C397E6F7EEC.EB514CB227F8BAFB.F49C9B9A4FBF795C@library-proxy.airnews.net><z1ef2.322$S7.782@news.flash.net> <01be2daf$fced7620$LocalHost@default> <s+C3BBAV7Ag2EwGz@jmwa.demon.co.uk> Organization: Global Link Information Services Ltd. Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc,hk.rec.audio-visual,uk.rec.audio,tw.bbs.rec.audiophile