🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: rec.audio
Article #1556

Re: DAT copy protection

#1556
From: Ketil Kirkerud
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 1989 16:00
26 lines
1451 bytes
In article <sZ3O9Ae00WB_B0829S@andrew.cmu.edu> yh0a+@andrew.cmu.edu (Yary Richard Phillip Hluchan) writes:

   I think it makes more sense for the DAT copy-protection to work like this:

   DAT can take 44.1 kHz data ==> 48 kHz
                              ^^^

This takes quite a bit of signal processing to do, and would raise the price
of DAT decks a LOT..

   DAT will not take 48 kHz data

   44.1 kHz is the rate CD's are recorded at, 48 kHz is the DAT rate.
   Of course, this method would not let you make DAT-to-DAT tapes of your
   daughters first glockenspiel recital, but the record companies don't care
   about that!

This, of course, will be the largest problem : My main use for DAT 
(when I get hold of one...) will be for music recording/mastering :
Not being able to make (digital) copies would seriously cripple 
the usefulness of the system : There is always som editing, etc
to be done.. 


---Ketil
Technical Details
Message-ID: <2013@ifi.uio.no>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!usc!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!ifi!ketil
References: <sZ3O9Ae00WB_B0829S@andrew.cmu.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!usc!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!ifi!ketil
From: ketil@ifi.uio.no (Ketil Kirkerud)
Newsgroups: rec.audio,rec.music.cd,gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: DAT copy protection
Message-ID: <2013@ifi.uio.no>
Date: 13 Sep 89 16:00:32 GMT
References: <sZ3O9Ae00WB_B0829S@andrew.cmu.edu>
Organization: University of Oslo, Norway
Lines: 26
In-reply-to: yh0a+@andrew.cmu.edu's message of 13 Sep 89 00:41:48 GMT