🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: rec.audio
Article #5371

Re: Adcom 575 vs. Rotel 955

#5371
From: Sam Daniel
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1993 18:57
17 lines
1152 bytes
Unfortunately, the Rotel 955 is not exactly the same as the 855.
Rotel added a small capacitor in the wrong place, changing the sound
for the worse.  I have seen a news message or article somewhere
telling how to cancel the modification (and the warrantee), so the
problem can be fixed.

The Adcom 575 is not as good as their new 675 changer, which has
updated circuitry.

Try the NAD 5000 or 53xx players and see what you think.
-- 
*
Sam Daniel          *   UUCP (Smart):  daniel@netcom.com
Paramax Systems     *         (Dumb):  {...}!uunet!netcom!daniel
1001 W. Maude Ave.  *          Voice:  1-408-235-2661
Sunnyvale, CA 95131 *     Disclaimer:  It's only my opinion, but it's
                                       a DAMN good one...
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan1.185737.9006@netcom.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!daniel
References: <1993Jan1.164204.826@news.ysu.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: rec.audio
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!daniel
From: daniel@netcom.com (Sam Daniel)
Subject: Re: Adcom 575 vs. Rotel 955
Message-ID: <1993Jan1.185737.9006@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
References: <1993Jan1.164204.826@news.ysu.edu>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 18:57:37 GMT
Lines: 17