Article View: rec.audio
Article #5384Re: Stereo Review's critical judgement
From: Andrew Hume
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 03:46
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 03:46
16 lines
1178 bytes
1178 bytes
In article <1993Jan1.015237.447@leland.Stanford.EDU>, paulxxxx@leland.Stanford.EDU (paulastya gupta) writes: > I agree with most persons that Stereo Review is not an altogether good > source of information, but it does help ground one to reality (its OK to > not be able to afford 20k for a system). i would point out that according to a study submitted to the letters section of stereophile, the high-end mags like stereophile and TAS actually reviewed a higher percentage of low end componets than did either audio or stereo review. hard to believe but the evidence was there (a one year sample). andrew hume p.s. for my money, stereo review is worthless except for the rodrigues cartoons.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<24533@alice.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!att!allegra!alice!andrewReferences:
<1993Jan1.015237.447@leland.Stanford.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!att!allegra!alice!andrew From: andrew@alice.att.com (Andrew Hume) Newsgroups: rec.audio Subject: Re: Stereo Review's critical judgement Summary: audiophile mags do low end as well Message-ID: <24533@alice.att.com> Date: 2 Jan 93 03:46:57 GMT Article-I.D.: alice.24533 References: <1993Jan1.015237.447@leland.Stanford.EDU> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill NJ Lines: 16