Article View: rec.audio
Article #5387Re: questions on new digital formats
From: Kerry Shetline
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 04:53
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 04:53
19 lines
1575 bytes
1575 bytes
In article <ibhan.725943044@husc.harvard.edu>, ibhan@husc8.harvard.edu (Ishir Bhan) wrote: > I agree, but I haven't seen any ads in magazines for MiniDisc yet, though > I've seen quite a few for DCC. Not too smart, Sony. I'm sure they'll > appear soon, though. Right now, both DCC and MiniDisc are out of my price > range. There's no doubt in my mind that MiniDisc is the better system. > I'm just waiting for cheaper/smaller units. From a techno-gadget viewpoint, I find MD much more appealing than DCC. Also, more importantly, MD is a more physically robust medium. However, in my limited exposure to actually hearing the two formats, DCC sounded better. The conditions were far from equal, however -- different music, different headphones, and no immediate comparison to CD was possible. Since my subjective impressions were exactly in line with my expectations based on foreknowledge of the two formats (DCC compresses less severely than MD), I consider these impressions suspect, and will reserve judgement until such time as I can arrange better testing. -Kerry
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<shetline-010193234102@128.89.19.85>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!news.bbn.com!NewsWatcher!userReferences:
<725768980.2401.0@elara.esl.acs.cmu.edu> <1i2u6fINN529@network.ucsd.edu> <ibhan.725943044@husc.harvard.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!news.bbn.com!NewsWatcher!user From: shetline@bbn.com (Kerry Shetline) Newsgroups: rec.audio Subject: Re: questions on new digital formats Followup-To: rec.audio Date: 2 Jan 1993 04:53:15 GMT Organization: BBN Lines: 19 Distribution: world Message-ID: <shetline-010193234102@128.89.19.85> References: <725768980.2401.0@elara.esl.acs.cmu.edu> <1i2u6fINN529@network.ucsd.edu> <ibhan.725943044@husc.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com