Article View: rec.audio
Article #5473Re: Radio Shack garbage
From: Bruce A. Haugh
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 15:22
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 15:22
22 lines
1552 bytes
1552 bytes
In <1993Jan4.024012.27235@Princeton.EDU> janaka@really.bored (Space Cadet) writes: >why would it be a compliment to say that Radio Shack speakers are made by Bose? >After all, anyone who owns anything like Boston Acoustics or Mirage (in the same >price range as Bose) will agree that Bose speaker are poorly constructed and their >sound lacks the detail present in *DECENT* speakers. >--- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >| jwithana@phoenix.princeton.edu janaka@lucille.princeton.edu | >| mjw@clarity.princeton.edu JWITHANA@PUCC.bitnet bt283@po.cwru.edu | > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hey, Radio Shack speakers need all the help they can get, do you deny at all that Bose is better than RS speakers. Like I said, all garbage,true. I prefer Paradigm. Bruce umhaugh0@ccu.umanitoba.ca Miles wanna-be.................................................................
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C0C5Cx.GA3@ccu.umanitoba.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!utcsri!newsflash.concordia.ca!mizar.cc.umanitoba.ca!umhaugh0References:
<C0AwKt.Jp6@ccu.umanitoba.ca> <1993Jan4.024012.27235@Princeton.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: rec.audio Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!utcsri!newsflash.concordia.ca!mizar.cc.umanitoba.ca!umhaugh0 From: umhaugh0@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Bruce A. Haugh) Subject: Re: Radio Shack garbage Message-ID: <C0C5Cx.GA3@ccu.umanitoba.ca> Sender: news@ccu.umanitoba.ca Nntp-Posting-Host: norton.cc.umanitoba.ca Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada References: <C0AwKt.Jp6@ccu.umanitoba.ca> <1993Jan4.024012.27235@Princeton.EDU> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 15:22:08 GMT Lines: 24