Article View: rec.audio
Article #5476Speaker Building -- a progess report on my project.
From: Thomas J. Trebisky
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 05:59
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 05:59
98 lines
5836 bytes
5836 bytes
In a bold attempt to actually build myself a set of speakers (encouraged by a friend who built a pair and loaned them to me for a while to try out -- very nice, it definitely can be done), I have begun my quest as follows: Comments are invited, consider this a design review.... Step 1: Gather information -- at first this was reading a copy of the book by David Weems. Used to be sold by Radio Shack (a mark against it, I know), but now out in a 3rd edition by McGraw Hill. Then fired off requests to Madisound, A and S speakers, and others for catalogs and info. Then ordered Dickason's cookbook. These catalogs are gold-mines of info. Finally got bold enough for step 2. (Oh, and our library had a copy of the AES anthology). Step 2: order drivers. My strategy is to first build a small set of satellites with pretty decent bass response, then in the future build a subwoofer and enhance my system. But for now the satellites: What I ordered was a pair of Peerless TP165R/8 -- a 6.5 inch woofer actually part number 833599 with Fs=36.2 Hz, Qts = 0.28, Vas = 32.2 Liter. Also ordered a pair of Vifa D25AG35-06 aluminum dome tweeters. The cost is $35.00 for the Peerless and $24.00 for the Vifa, so for a pair of speakers, I have invested $118.00 in drivers. My target was $100.00 for the pair (for drivers), but the extra should be money well spent. If I did it again, I would probably get the Peerless CC series driver for $41.50, but this one should be fine. Step 3: design the box. The Peerless is a low Q driver intended for a bass reflex design. I ignored the advice that a beginner should start with a closed box design -- we will see about that. Choosing a QB3 alignment and using Dickason's tables for Ql = 7, I get a box volume of 573 cubic inches (9.39 liters) for this driver. I am gonna overvolume my box by 25 percent -- just for safety -- I can always throw bricks inside later to consume the extra volume -- My final box will be 8.5 inch deep, 10 inches wide, and 15 inches tall. Purchased my sheet of 3/4 inch MDF for $16.00 and have been getting along pretty will with my skill saw with a carbide blade and a guide to bang the box together. It is using less than half the 4x8 sheet, so if I really screw up, I am only out $8.00 bucks and I can try again! Step 4: design the vent. I did buy a piece of 2 inch PVC pipe for this purpose -- calculations indicate a piece of this about 6 inches long would be about right (and be a bit too close to the rear of the box). BUT, I decided to ignore a bit of advice and try using a "shelf port". Dickason blows this off and refers you to Thieles paper. Thiele says this is his prefered method. Something about it just appeals to me -- it allows the widest and longest vent for a given box. Fiddling with the equations, I am gonna have a 1/2 inch tall slot the full width of the box for a port. A shelf port is a scheme like this in cross-section, BTW: ________________ | | | | | Tw | | | | | <- may put a brace (sheet with big hole) here. | | | | | | | Woofe| | | | _____________| |_______________ <- here is the shelf port (see why the name?) We will see how this all turns out. Like I say, I have the drivers in hand and am working on the box, I will update you all as things progress. Anyone with comments (like, "You idiot, why are you doing that", is welcome to email me or post or whatever (that is why I am posting this actually)). Ultimately I intend to use an active crossover and biamp (well tri-amp when I have a subwoofer, some fine day), but for now (lacking the "iron" for such ventures), I am gonna hack together a "get me by for now" crossover. The plan is to use a 2nd order job for the Tweeter (a 7 uF cap in series and a 0.5 mH coil across the tweeter). This should be a 12dB per octave roll-off at 3 Khz. The woofer will get a 0.45 mH coil in series with it, just a simple 6dB per octave first order treatment. Oh yes, and I have one L-pad, I am gonna adjust it to balance the two drivers, then replace it with a fixed array of power resistors (I have a big junk box full of them). Other bizarre schemes await a future post to be revealed. Oh, and a footnote -- there has been some ridiculous harangue in this group about whether it is better to build speakers or build them. I would say, if you just want speakers, buy them! If you enjoy building things and want speakers, build them (well, maybe evaluate your woodworking skills first). I doubt that speaker building is for everyone, but there are those to whom such things has a certain appeal -- and I do fully expect that my speakers will compare favorably with commercial designs that cost more (whether this hope will be realized or not remains to be seen, but I do expect it at this stage. :-) ). Particle board is cheap -- as long as I do not burn up my drivers, I can build boxes till I am satisfied, the duds can feed the fireplace if necessary, but I am hoping for better things, even on the first round. -- Tom Trebisky ttrebisky@as.arizona.edu This program posts news to thousands of machines throughout the entire civilized world. Your message will cost the net hundreds if not thousands of
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan21.055942.25615@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!ncar!noao!amethyst!organpipe.uug.arizona.edu!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!ncar!noao!amethyst!organpipe.uug.arizona.edu!news From: tom@astro.as.arizona.edu (Thomas J. Trebisky) Newsgroups: rec.audio Subject: Speaker Building -- a progess report on my project. Message-ID: <1993Jan21.055942.25615@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> Date: 21 Jan 93 05:59:42 GMT Sender: news@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ Lines: 98