🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: rec.audio
Article #5479

Re: Digital critics - sampling argument is nonsense

#5479
From: John Galloway
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 08:42
32 lines
2331 bytes
>In article <1993Jan20.211233.37643@watson.ibm.com> zellers@22_clancy.manassas.ibm.com (Cevin M Zellers) writes:
>I recently witnessed another case of the analog sentimentalist trying
>to use the 'sampling' argument to lodge a complaint against Digital.
>
>It was MTV, with they're nifty diagrams showing how sampled digital sound
>loses information because of the 'choppy' digital waveform. Unfortunately,
>critics are pressing this argument and misleading the public, due to their
>ignorance of the Nyquist Sampling theorem. All of you digital skeptics, 
>please note that CD's capture ALL frequencies up to 44.5 KHz, reproducing
>them faithfully (butter than vinyl, I argue). Frequencies above 44.5 KHz
>don't matter, that's far above the threshold of hearing anyway :)
>
>Cevin
I think you ment 22KHz which would be the Nyquist rate for sampling
at 44KHz.  One might argue that the Nyquist rate only assures frequence
not wave shape so that a 20KHz cut off would not distinguish a 12KHz sine
wave from a 12KHz sawtooth, and that human hearing might not be strictly
frequence response bassed, but I will not since my real purpose here is
to shamlesly slide into a commercial announcement: for all those analog
lovers, I have a fantastic 10 year old SOTA Saphire tunrtable (Grace arm,
and Vanderstien head amp) that I would love to sell so I can buy more CDs!!
call me.
	-jrg

internet    jrg@galloway.sj.ca.us  John R. Galloway, Jr  795 Beaver Creek Way
internet    johng@informix.com     CEO...receptionist    San Jose, CA   95133
applelink   D3413                  Galloway Research     (408) 259-2490

-- 
internet    jrg@galloway.sj.ca.us  John R. Galloway, Jr  795 Beaver Creek Way
internet    johng@informix.com     CEO...receptionist    San Jose, CA   95133
applelink   D3413                  Galloway Research     (408) 259-2490
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan21.084202.29994@informix.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!gossip.pyramid.com!pyramid!infmx!johng
References: <1993Jan20.211233.37643@watson.ibm.com> <1993Jan20.235905.27931@leland.Stanford.EDU>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!gossip.pyramid.com!pyramid!infmx!johng
From: johng@informix.com (John Galloway)
Newsgroups: rec.audio
Subject: Re: Digital critics - sampling argument is nonsense
Message-ID: <1993Jan21.084202.29994@informix.com>
Date: 21 Jan 93 08:42:02 GMT
References: <1993Jan20.211233.37643@watson.ibm.com> <1993Jan20.235905.27931@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: news@informix.com (Usenet News)
Organization: Galloway Research
Lines: 32