Re: Another Sub Woofer question

Article View: rec.audio

Article #5483

#5483

From: Pi(3.143832666)
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 16:37

15 lines
1266 bytes

In article <1993Jan4.084318.1@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi>, lauusitalo@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi writes...
> 
>        I have no knowledge about your main speakers but I have had a feeling
>        that Klipsh's are quite nonsensitive, so if you abandon your other
>        amplifier and go for passive filters then you would need more power
>        in one amplifier than with active system.

What, praytell, qualifies as sensitive when Klipschs are "quite
nonsensitive"?  I thought that was one of the main bonuses of
using a horn-- high sensitivity.  The Forte IIs, if I remember
correctly, have a 99dB or so SPL.

Living better through chemistry,
Mike "Pi" Freeman
MJF9968@rigel.tamu.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4JAN199310371445@rigel.tamu.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun.tamu.edu!rigel.tamu.edu!mjf9968

References: <1992Dec31.170723.12609@colorado.edu> <1993Jan4.084318.1@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun.tamu.edu!rigel.tamu.edu!mjf9968
From: mjf9968@rigel.tamu.edu (Pi(3.143832666))
Newsgroups: rec.audio
Subject: Re: Another Sub Woofer question
Date: 4 Jan 1993 10:37 CST
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Lines: 15
Distribution: na
Message-ID: <4JAN199310371445@rigel.tamu.edu>
References: <1992Dec31.170723.12609@colorado.edu> <1993Jan4.084318.1@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rigel.tamu.edu
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

Reply to Parent Message