Article View: rec.audio
Article #7108Re: Acoustimass / Satalite Systems...
From: Richard d Pierce
Date: Tue, 19 May 1992 03:16
Date: Tue, 19 May 1992 03:16
43 lines
3005 bytes
3005 bytes
In article <14675@vd.seqeb.gov.au> BSD_GORDON@vd.seqeb.gov.au writes: >> I was wondering if anyone has had any experience with the acoustimass >> /Satellite systems offered by companies like BOSE and Wharfdale ? > >I've heard the Bose system. Very nice, but expensive. > >> but science dosn't always sound the best . I know that when testing box >> speakers it was found that the best response was when the tweeders were >> removed from the main box and put in seperate modules outside . > >To my knowledge all tweeters are in enclosed at the back, so it doesn't matter >if they are in the box with the woofer or not. Yes, for the most part, that is true, but the effects is much more subtle profound than simply a case of whether or not (specifically not) there is any interaction through the rear of the tweeter or not. The radiation load presented to the tweeter mounted on a baffle that must also hold a woofer or two is very different than one which is just big enough to hold the tweeter itself. (note I said different, not worse or better). >The advantages are: >- able to place the mid-range/tweeters just about anywhere; close to walls. > They're nice & inconspicuous >- the subwoofer unit can be put out of the way & because of its design can > often go lower (in Hz) than a two-way system of compariable price. > The primary advantages of an "acoustimass" subwoofer system (a specific implementation of what is referred to as a bandpass enclosure) is that the upper end crossover is purely acoustic, not electrical, which has the advantage of filtering out spurious output generated by the driver itself in addition to the normal program material. As such, the acoustic crossover is far, far cheaper and easier to implement than an electrical network at the same frequency. It's also much easier to control in manufacturing. By-the-by, if any of you rec.audio readers are also interested in the ultimate in Alpine profiles, stop by and take a look at the curves I took of a Bose AM-5 system. Pretty saddening and sobering at once! -- ********************************************************* ** Dick Pierce : Loudspeaker and Software Consulting ** ** 17 Sartelle Street Pepperell, MA 01463 ** ** (508) 433-9183 (Voice and FAX) **
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BoHAG0.ns@world.std.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!world!DPierceReferences:
<9213608.13050@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <14675@vd.seqeb.gov.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10d431,5c0494e1b41c7147 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d431,public X-Google-Thread: 108c0a,5c0494e1b41c7147 X-Google-Attributes: gid108c0a,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-05-18 15:22:26 PST Newsgroups: rec.audio,aus.hi-fi Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!world!DPierce From: DPierce@world.std.com (Richard d Pierce) Subject: Re: Acoustimass / Satalite Systems... Message-ID: <BoHAG0.ns@world.std.com> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA References: <9213608.13050@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <14675@vd.seqeb.gov.au> Date: Tue, 19 May 1992 03:16:47 GMT Lines: 43