Article View: rec.bicycles
Article #56Re: full suspension mtbs
From: M.J.Davis
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 12:23
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 12:23
33 lines
1963 bytes
1963 bytes
I can see the advantages of the Allsop system (anything's better than nothing :-) ) but I have a couple of queries... 1) How does it perform in fast bumpy corners? In loose corners, I often lean the bike way over while staying relatively upright myself (ie off the saddle) Isn't the beam bike just as likely to get knocked off line in a corner as a rigid bike? Indeed, is a suspended bike (rather than a suspended rider) system any better in this circumstance? I have only briefly tried the various systems myself. 2) Is the reduction in standover height a problem? 3) Does a beam bike benefit from lower gears to facilitate a "sit down and spin" riding style, to get max. use from the beam on rough climbs? Personally I like the idea of a rigid frame with suspension forks (for control) and some form of saddle suspension (post or beam) for comfort/efficiency. I am absolutely sure that variable saddle/pedal distance is not as bad as being unable to keep pedalling rhythm over the bumps. Mike. PS I've seen a custom tandem with a beam for the stoker. Stoker's back pain is apparently a major problem. Know anything about this? -- Michael J Davis | cs92mjd@ac.uk.ex.cen Dept. of Computer Science | -or- University of Exeter, UK | cs92mjd@cen.ex.uk.ac -- Michael J Davis | cs92mjd@ac.uk.ex.cen Dept. of Computer Science | -or- University of Exeter, UK | cs92mjd@cen.ex.uk.ac
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BwvuEu.FM1@cen.ex.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!uknet!strath-cs!cen.ex.ac.uk!cs92mjdReferences:
<kqaBTB3w165w@cyberden.uucp> <16190422@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!uknet!strath-cs!cen.ex.ac.uk!cs92mjd From: cs92mjd@cen.ex.ac.uk (M.J.Davis) Newsgroups: rec.bicycles Subject: Re: full suspension mtbs Message-ID: <BwvuEu.FM1@cen.ex.ac.uk> Date: 29 Oct 92 12:23:18 GMT References: <kqaBTB3w165w@cyberden.uucp> <16190422@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM> Sender: cs92mjd@cen.ex.ac.uk Organization: Computer Unit. - University of Exeter. UK Lines: 28 In-Reply-To: gmh@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM's message of 28 Oct 92 21:32:18 GMT