Thread View: rec.birds
7 messages
7 total messages
Started by Paul Mackenzie
Sun, 24 Jan 1993 18:41
Binoculars Question
Author: Paul Mackenzie
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 18:41
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 18:41
11 lines
955 bytes
955 bytes
I assume there must be some people in this group who know about binoculars - can anyone tell me what the numbers listed with a particular unit mean? I've seen a few in stores that say 8 x 40mm or something like this, and I've also seen things like field of vision is 340' at 1000 ft. Can anyone tell me how to decipher the magnification out of these so I don't buy a cheap pair of field glasses? Thanks, Paul
Re: Binoculars Question
Author: Terry Chau
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 15:46
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 15:46
59 lines
3565 bytes
3565 bytes
In article <1993Jan24.184101.27715@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu>, mackenzi@McRCIM.McGill.EDU (Paul Mackenzie) writes: |> |> I assume there must be some people in this group who know about |> binoculars - can anyone tell me what the numbers listed with |> a particular unit mean? I've seen a few in stores that say |> 8 x 40mm or something like this, and I've also seen things like |> field of vision is 340' at 1000 ft. Can anyone tell me how to |> decipher the magnification out of these so I don't buy a cheap |> pair of field glasses? |> |> Thanks, |> Paul The first number is the magnification, and the second number is the diameter of the objective lens in millimeters. The wider the lens, the more light it can collect, and the brighter the images. So 8 x 40 simply means 8x magnification with 40 mm wide lens. I suppose that the higher the magnification, the better for birding. Usually high magnification comes with wide lenses, plus weight and the cost goes up. The monster binoculars go up to something like 20 x 100. I think they're mostly used for astronomy. Are they too unweildy for birding, anyone? I have a pair 10 x 50 Bushnell binoculars w/ Insta-Focus. It's good for astronomy, and it's really great for birding, too. It's not too heavy, but it is a little tiring if you hold it up for a long time. It's no big deal though. I bought it a few years ago for about $60. Most high quality 10 x 50 binoculars go for about $200. Even good 7 x 35 binoculars go for $100 plus. My $60 binoculars is good enough for me. In my case, I would rather spend money on a spotting scope instead of replacing my binoculars for a better $200 one. In other words, the less expensive models are sometimes good enough. Unless, you are highly perceptive and notice the less-than-optimum optics, or if you have the money. Before you buy a new pair of binoculars, it's a good idea to test them out. For example, you can look through the binoculars a foot away. The circle of light should be centered in the eyepiece lens. If you look at a horizontal line, it should also look horizontal through the binoculars. If you look at a white wall, it should look white through the binoculars, not yellow or blue or whatever. Just make sure that there are no grossly misaligned optics, and scratched lenses. Just a precaution. However, that 340' at 1000 ft, I can't tell you about. I read it somewhere, but I forgot about it. Someone else? Field glasses are a little different than binoculars. These were around before prisms were used, which made binoculars much more compact than field glasses. Field glasses were two telescopes mounted side-by-side. So they turned out to be more than one feet long. Very unweildy. It might be nice to have in your home though. Does anyone know if there is a big difference in the image quality between a $60 binoculars and a $200 binoculars? I haven't tried out the more expensive models. Maybe I'm too complacent with my own pair of $60 binoculars. -- Chau
Re: Binoculars Question
Author: Mick Farmer
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 03:10
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 03:10
10 lines
688 bytes
688 bytes
Paul asks the meaning of 8 x 40 for bins. The 8 is the magnification and the 40 is the diameter of the objective lens. The value 40 / 8 (i.e. 5) is a measure of the width of the field of view. Thus 7 x 42 have a lower magnification, but a wider field of view -- better for following birds through trees relatively close to. Regards, Mick
Re: Binoculars Question
Author: robert.m.atkins
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 18:19
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 18:19
38 lines
2564 bytes
2564 bytes
In article <mick.728017855@picus>, mick@dcs.bbk.ac.uk (Mick Farmer) writes: > Paul asks the meaning of 8 x 40 for bins. The 8 is the > magnification and the 40 is the diameter of the objective > lens. The value 40 / 8 (i.e. 5) is a measure of the width > of the field of view. Thus 7 x 42 have a lower > magnification, but a wider field of view -- better for > following birds through trees relatively close to. > The field of view is not directly defined by magnification. It is a function of both magnification and eyepiece design. Thus a 10x50 binocular can have a wider field of view than a 7x50, if designed to do so. The problem is that the quality of the image can get quite poor at the edge of the field in a wide field design unless you take a lot of care (i.e. expensive). Within any give power binoculars (say 7x35s), each will probably have a different field of view though all are 7 power. The diameter divided by the power (40/8 in the above example) has nothing at all to do with field of view. It gives what is called the "exit pupil" of the system (pretty much the diameter of the rays of light coming out of the binocular and into your eye). By and large, the larger this number is, the brighter the image will be in the dark. Numbers larger than 7(mm) provide no advantage since most eyes cannot open their pupils wider than 7mm. Thus you see 7x50s but not 5x50s. There are other factors affecting image brightness, but exit pupil is probably the most important. The pupil of the eye contracts in bright light (to maybe 3 or 4mm?), so in daylight exit pupils larger than this do not give brighter images. This means that in daylight 10x50s and 7x50s will give images which look equally bright, but at night things will look brighter in the 7x50s (assuming good eyes). Maximum pupil size decreases with age, so as you can see there are a few other factors to consider! Now back to birds... =============================================================== Bob Atkins AT&T Bell Labs email (direct) att!clockwise!rma ===============================================================
Re: Binoculars Question
Author: Adam Winer
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 18:45
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 18:45
21 lines
1461 bytes
1461 bytes
mick@dcs.bbk.ac.uk (Mick Farmer) writes:
>Paul asks the meaning of 8 x 40 for bins. The 8 is the
>magnification and the 40 is the diameter of the objective
>lens. The value 40 / 8 (i.e. 5) is a measure of the width
>of the field of view. Thus 7 x 42 have a lower
>magnification, but a wider field of view -- better for
>following birds through trees relatively close to.
I'm pretty sure this is incorrect. The value 40/8 (5)
is a measure of how wide the image leaving the binoculars is.
In other words, it measures not how wide a field of view you get,
but how much light you can see. 8 x 40 bins and 7 x 35 bins
(everything else equal) give you the same brightness of image,
but could have completely different fields of view.
Any ratio over 7 is wasted, because the human eye's maximum
pupil width is 7 mm.
--
Adam Winer | The number you have reached is imaginary.
WINER@HUSC.HARVARD.EDU | Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and
| try again.
Re: Binoculars Question
Author: Steve Willner
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 18:09
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 18:09
34 lines
2134 bytes
2134 bytes
> >Paul asks the meaning of 8 x 40 for bins. In article <winer.728073920@husc.harvard.edu>, winer@husc10.harvard.edu (Adam Winer) writes: > The value 40/8 (5) > is a measure of how wide the image leaving the binoculars is. This is correct, though it might be better to think of it as the ray bundle. The technical term is "exit pupil diameter." Cheaper binoculars have square exit pupils because of vignetting in the prism. In these, the "diameter" is actually the size of the diagonal of the square, and you get only 2/pi of the light you would expect. > In other words, it measures not how wide a field of view you get, > but how much light you can see. 8 x 40 bins and 7 x 35 bins > (everything else equal) give you the same brightness of image, > but could have completely different fields of view. > Any ratio over 7 is wasted, because the human eye's maximum > pupil width is 7 mm. In fact, for birding, any diameter over about 3 or 4 mm is wasted. Check out your pupil size in twilight some time. (This opinion is contrary to a lot of received wisdom, but I stand by it.) Exit pupil diameters up to 7 mm _may_ be useful for surveillance or astronomy or other observing in full darkness, but even then not everyone's eyes will open that wide. -- Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123 Bitnet: willner@cfa Cambridge, MA 02138 USA Internet: willner@cfa.harvard.edu member, League for Programming Freedom; contact league@prep.ai.mit.edu
Re: Binoculars Question
Author: Chris Havel
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 16:07
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 16:07
36 lines
2232 bytes
2232 bytes
mackenzi@McRCIM.McGill.EDU (Paul Mackenzie) writes:
>I assume there must be some people in this group who know about
>binoculars - can anyone tell me what the numbers listed with
>a particular unit mean? I've seen a few in stores that say
>8 x 40mm or something like this, and I've also seen things like
>field of vision is 340' at 1000 ft. Can anyone tell me how to
>decipher the magnification out of these so I don't buy a cheap
>pair of field glasses?
>Thanks,
>Paul
The first set of numbers-8x40mm: The first number stands for the
magnification power. The higher it is,
the closer objects appear, but the harder
it is to keep the object steady. The
second number is the diameter of the large
lens on the end of the bincos. The larger
this lens, the more light gathered, and the
clearer objects will seem.
The second set-340'/1000': The field of view is the amount of area you can
see at once through the glasses. With a 340/1000,
you can scan an area 340' across, 1000' distant
without moving the binocs.
These sound like solid glasses for birding to me (though I prefer something
with a wider field of view). When looking fora good set, make sure they are
waterproof and come with fully coated optics (coated optics cut down on the
amount of light lost due to reflection off the lens...the more light making
it to your eyes the better!!)
Chris
Kansas Dept. Of Wildlife and Parks
chavel@matt.ksu.ksu.edu
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads