🚀 go-pugleaf

For what it's worth ... caught the tail end of a TV show discussing a Merc
(100 hp?) that automatically reduces to 2 cyl operation below a certain rpm
(1200 ?) ... dunno if that may be worth your while looking into for fishing,
idling around the lake.


"KRead" <read@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:DlN6b.447$Nx6.75720@news20.bellglobal.com...
> Hi all,
>     My first post to this news group.
>
> I am looking at purchasing a new boat.  I need one that is usable for
> fishing and usable for touring the lake, with 4-6 people.  I have narrowed
> the search to the following two boats:
>
>    1. Lund: Prosport 1700
>    2. PrinceCraft superpro 176
>
> Both boats are 2003 models, and both with a 4 stroke Merc 115HP.
>
> Any good point, bad points with the above boats?   Which one is better?
Any
> body out there with experience with both?
>
> Thanks,
> Ken
>
>

"bowgus" <Bowgus@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:w2P6b.184814$_V.54366@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> For what it's worth ... caught the tail end of a TV show discussing a
Merc
> (100 hp?) that automatically reduces to 2 cyl operation below a
certain rpm
> (1200 ?) ... dunno if that may be worth your while looking into for
fishing,
> idling around the lake.
>
>
> "KRead" <read@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:DlN6b.447$Nx6.75720@news20.bellglobal.com...
> > Hi all,
> >     My first post to this news group.
> >
> > I am looking at purchasing a new boat.  I need one that is usable
for
> > fishing and usable for touring the lake, with 4-6 people.  I have
narrowed
> > the search to the following two boats:
> >
> >    1. Lund: Prosport 1700
> >    2. PrinceCraft superpro 176
> >
> > Both boats are 2003 models, and both with a 4 stroke Merc 115HP.
> >
> > Any good point, bad points with the above boats?   Which one is
better?
> Any
> > body out there with experience with both?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ken
> >
Lund boats are highly thought of in Minnesota and maintain their value
well.  Princecraft are Canadian and have a much smaller market share
here in this part of the country.

The 115 Merc/Yamaha 4 stroke is said to be a very nice motor.  The ones
I've observed certainly have been.

My guess is that the boats would both be satisfactory, and perhaps the
choice should be determined by your location and the line carried by
your preferred dealer.

del cecchi
> >
>
>

I have no experience with the specific Lund you mentioned, but I've owned a
WC-14 for 4 years. All it's got is bench seats and the lights *I* installed,
so I can't speak to the issue of how all your attached accessories would
hold up. But:

1) I've asked the dealer numerous times to let me know if a bigger, USED
Lund comes along. His response is always something like "Yeah...right.
You've gotta inherit them from someone. Nobody seems to get rid of them".

2) I take my boat through choppy water it really doesn't belong in and beat
the crap out of it. The only seepage I've ever had is when I haven't noticed
that the drain plug is getting worn out. The rest of the boat's still nice &
tight, and the hull paint has held up beautifully.

Unless I needed a boat style that Lund didn't make, I wouldn't buy anything
else next time around.
-Doug

"KRead" <read@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:DlN6b.447$Nx6.75720@news20.bellglobal.com...
> Hi all,
>     My first post to this news group.
>
> I am looking at purchasing a new boat.  I need one that is usable for
> fishing and usable for touring the lake, with 4-6 people.  I have narrowed
> the search to the following two boats:
>
>    1. Lund: Prosport 1700
>    2. PrinceCraft superpro 176
>
> Both boats are 2003 models, and both with a 4 stroke Merc 115HP.
>
> Any good point, bad points with the above boats?   Which one is better?
Any
> body out there with experience with both?
>
> Thanks,
> Ken
>
>

I have owned a 1991 Princecraft Super Pro 196 for 7 years. During that time
we have had to replace the deck and a few rivets have popped below the
waterline. It has been used in salt water and run hard. Handles rough water
ok. When contacting Princecraft with questions a few years ago received
little to no help so I don't bother now. FYI
Steve

"del cecchi" <dcecchi@msn.com> wrote in message
news:NkS6b.200$mk1.5465@eagle.america.net...
>
> "bowgus" <Bowgus@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:w2P6b.184814$_V.54366@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> > For what it's worth ... caught the tail end of a TV show discussing a
> Merc
> > (100 hp?) that automatically reduces to 2 cyl operation below a
> certain rpm
> > (1200 ?) ... dunno if that may be worth your while looking into for
> fishing,
> > idling around the lake.
> >
> >
> > "KRead" <read@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> > news:DlN6b.447$Nx6.75720@news20.bellglobal.com...
> > > Hi all,
> > >     My first post to this news group.
> > >
> > > I am looking at purchasing a new boat.  I need one that is usable
> for
> > > fishing and usable for touring the lake, with 4-6 people.  I have
> narrowed
> > > the search to the following two boats:
> > >
> > >    1. Lund: Prosport 1700
> > >    2. PrinceCraft superpro 176
> > >
> > > Both boats are 2003 models, and both with a 4 stroke Merc 115HP.
> > >
> > > Any good point, bad points with the above boats?   Which one is
> better?
> > Any
> > > body out there with experience with both?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ken
> > >
> Lund boats are highly thought of in Minnesota and maintain their value
> well.  Princecraft are Canadian and have a much smaller market share
> here in this part of the country.
>
> The 115 Merc/Yamaha 4 stroke is said to be a very nice motor.  The ones
> I've observed certainly have been.
>
> My guess is that the boats would both be satisfactory, and perhaps the
> choice should be determined by your location and the line carried by
> your preferred dealer.
>
> del cecchi
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

KRead wrote:
> Hi all,
>     My first post to this news group.
> 
> I am looking at purchasing a new boat.  I need one that is usable for
> fishing and usable for touring the lake, with 4-6 people.  I have narrowed
> the search to the following two boats:
> 
>    1. Lund: Prosport 1700
>    2. PrinceCraft superpro 176
> 
> Both boats are 2003 models, and both with a 4 stroke Merc 115HP.
> 
> Any good point, bad points with the above boats?   Which one is better?  Any
> body out there with experience with both?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ken
> 
> 
Lund no question

I've had a 14.5 ft, high transom Lund for a long time also. Been in lots of
salt water, banged on rocks and driven too hard on the chop.

It's not pretty anymore, but it's watertight and handles bad weather well.
If they made weekend cruisers, my next boat would be a Lund too.

Surfnturf

"Doug Kanter" <dkanter@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:xJ%6b.2111$Rv.583@news02.roc.ny...
> I have no experience with the specific Lund you mentioned, but I've owned
a
> WC-14 for 4 years. All it's got is bench seats and the lights *I*
installed,
> so I can't speak to the issue of how all your attached accessories would
> hold up. But:
>
> 1) I've asked the dealer numerous times to let me know if a bigger, USED
> Lund comes along. His response is always something like "Yeah...right.
> You've gotta inherit them from someone. Nobody seems to get rid of them".
>
> 2) I take my boat through choppy water it really doesn't belong in and
beat
> the crap out of it. The only seepage I've ever had is when I haven't
noticed
> that the drain plug is getting worn out. The rest of the boat's still nice
&
> tight, and the hull paint has held up beautifully.
>
> Unless I needed a boat style that Lund didn't make, I wouldn't buy
anything
> else next time around.
> -Doug
>
> "KRead" <read@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:DlN6b.447$Nx6.75720@news20.bellglobal.com...
> > Hi all,
> >     My first post to this news group.
> >
> > I am looking at purchasing a new boat.  I need one that is usable for
> > fishing and usable for touring the lake, with 4-6 people.  I have
narrowed
> > the search to the following two boats:
> >
> >    1. Lund: Prosport 1700
> >    2. PrinceCraft superpro 176
> >
> > Both boats are 2003 models, and both with a 4 stroke Merc 115HP.
> >
> > Any good point, bad points with the above boats?   Which one is better?
> Any
> > body out there with experience with both?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ken
> >
> >
>
>