Re: Protecting park access from developers

Article View: rec.equestrian

Article #3040

#3040

From: Daniel Veditz
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 00:00

15 lines
1607 bytes

Mark A Parsons wrote:
> 
> An interesting post which nicely explains the concept of "highway".  I wonder
> though, does all this imply that it would be unlawful to restrict the type of
> traffic on highways?  In other words, how can motorized vehicles, bikes, or
> horses be banned from certain long standing highways?

Are they?  I thought they were only banned on "freeways" which are
relatively newly built, and built with those restrictions from the
beginning.  That's part of the significance of the "Begin Freeway" "end
Freeway" signs put up on otherwise unremarkable stretches of 101 and
other roads.

-Dan

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3421A3E3.81328021@netscape.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <5vpgtc$a93@nntp02.primenet.com> <34213F5E.1DD015FE@kryos.colorado.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10decc,dc60726cb5f9e78a
X-Google-Attributes: gid10decc,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e08b,dc60726cb5f9e78a
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e08b,public
X-Google-Thread: 114271,dc60726cb5f9e78a
X-Google-Attributes: gid114271,public
X-Google-Thread: 104429,dc60726cb5f9e78a
X-Google-Attributes: gid104429,public
X-Google-Thread: 1012ff,dc60726cb5f9e78a
X-Google-Attributes: gid1012ff,public
X-Google-Thread: 1086ba,dc60726cb5f9e78a
X-Google-Attributes: gid1086ba,public
From: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@netscape.com>
Subject: Re: Protecting park access from developers
Date: 1997/09/18
Message-ID: <3421A3E3.81328021@netscape.com>
X-Deja-AN: 273631851
References: <5vpgtc$a93@nntp02.primenet.com> <34213F5E.1DD015FE@kryos.colorado.edu>
Organization: Netscape Communications Corporation, Mozilla Division
Newsgroups: rec.equestrian,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.bicycles.off-road,ba.bicycles,ba.mountain-folk,rec.backcountry

Reply to Parent Message