Article View: rec.games.backgammon
Article #1Re: A timing problem
From: Dick King
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1992 02:08
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1992 02:08
40 lines
1773 bytes
1773 bytes
In article <1992Oct24.134431.3048@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> jrk2v@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (John Robert Klein) writes: >In article <1992Oct20.181039.22651@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> jrk2v@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (John Robert Klein) writes: >> >>This one came up the other day: >> >> >> |24 23 22 21 20 19| |18 17 16 15 14 13| >> |O O X X O O | |O O | >> |O O X X O O | |O O | >> | X | |O O | >> | | | | >> | | | | >> | X X | | | >> | X X X X | | | >> |O X X X X | | | [2] >> |1 2 3 4 5 6 | |7 8 9 10 11 12| >> >> >> Money game, X to play 6-5 >> >> Also comments on other cube positions and/or match scores >> are welcome. >> >> I like 21/15, 6/1*. It looks to be the most flexible >> but there are several other good possibilities. >> >> JK >> >> > >Michael Zehr and Dick King both like 21/10 better than 21/15, 6/1* and >it might be a better play. Something about hitting on the one point >does look wrong. > >Did anyone else consider 21/15, 21/16? Pick and Pass bait. -dk
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct30.020833.28932@kestrel.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!ames!sun-barr!olivea!charnel!rat!kestrel.edu!kingReferences:
<1992Oct20.181039.22651@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Oct24.134431.3048@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!ames!sun-barr!olivea!charnel!rat!kestrel.edu!king From: king@reasoning.com (Dick King) Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon Subject: Re: A timing problem Message-ID: <1992Oct30.020833.28932@kestrel.edu> Date: 30 Oct 92 02:08:33 GMT References: <1992Oct20.181039.22651@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Oct24.134431.3048@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Sender: news@kestrel.edu (News) Organization: Reasoning Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA Lines: 40 Nntp-Posting-Host: drums.reasoning.com