Article View: rec.games.backgammon
Article #152cube action
From: Paul Epstein
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1992 03:05
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1992 03:05
3 lines
696 bytes
696 bytes
It seems to me that a crucial bit of information is missing from Michael Zehr's inquiry about whether he was right to offer the cube in a given situation. Did he own the cube or was it in the middle?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct1.030503.9223@math.utexas.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!news.dell.com!math.utexas.edu!rene.ma.utexas.edu!epsteinShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!news.dell.com!math.utexas.edu!rene.ma.utexas.edu!epstein From: epstein@rene.ma.utexas.edu (Paul Epstein) Subject: cube action Message-ID: <1992Oct1.030503.9223@math.utexas.edu> Sender: usenet@math.utexas.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: rene.ma.utexas.edu Organization: University of Texas at Austin Mathematics Distribution: rec Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 03:05:03 GMT Lines: 5