Article View: rec.games.backgammon
Article #182>64 response to 53 opening
From: Paul Epstein
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 05:43
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 05:43
5 lines
775 bytes
775 bytes
There seems to be a consensus that making the 2 point with 64 is weak The poster of the original question was impressed by the fact that his oppon ent won the match impressively. Is there not a possibility that he/she was initially deliberately playing badly for psychological reasons?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct12.054356.20588@math.utexas.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!news.dell.com!math.utexas.edu!rene.ma.utexas.edu!epsteinShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!news.dell.com!math.utexas.edu!rene.ma.utexas.edu!epstein From: epstein@rene.ma.utexas.edu (Paul Epstein) Subject: >64 response to 53 opening Message-ID: <1992Oct12.054356.20588@math.utexas.edu> Sender: usenet@math.utexas.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: rene.ma.utexas.edu Organization: University of Texas at Austin Mathematics Distribution: rec Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 05:43:56 GMT Lines: 9