Article View: rec.games.backgammon
Article #19053 then 64 opening
From: Michael J Zehr
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 15:42
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 15:42
27 lines
1831 bytes
1831 bytes
I received this by e-mail with a request to post:
24 23 22 21 20 19 | 18 17 16 15 14 13
X O O | O X
X O O | O X
O | X
O | X
| X
| X to play 6-4
X | O
X | O
X | X O
O X | X O
O X | X O
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
I agree with you. Making 2 is a bad move. The options are 24-18 13-9
and 24-14. Now everyone else (so far) has gone for 24-14 on the grounds
that a man on 14 is only exposed to a single shot, whereas on 18 it's a
double shot. But:
i) with 24-18, 13-9 there are far more possibilities for X next roll if
missed. 24-14 achieves very little, maybe nothing if the man on 14
can't be safetied next time. Even then the position is very inflexible.
ii) Being hit on 18 leaves far more return shots (6-1, 6-2, 6-4, 6-5,
5-2, 4-3) than on 14 (6-5).
iii) O is also unlikely to choose to hit you on 18 with most 1's.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct15.154228.28933@athena.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!tadaShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!tada From: tada@athena.mit.edu (Michael J Zehr) Subject: 53 then 64 opening Message-ID: <1992Oct15.154228.28933@athena.mit.edu> Summary: Posting for someone else Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system) Nntp-Posting-Host: e40-008-11.mit.edu Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 15:42:28 GMT Lines: 29