🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: rec.games.backgammon
Article #32

Re: Mistake on 2nd Quiz

#32
From: Paul Gilberti
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 15:47
11 lines
879 bytes
I'll take a chance at ridicule.

In the first quiz:
  White will win in a maximum of two moves.  I would play 6-4 6-4 5-3 5-3
in the hope that white will not roll a double.  This allows me to win if I roll
double 4s, 5s or 6s.  I don't see any other chance at pulling this out.

Basically the same logic in the second quiz:
  I'd move 5-OFF 4-3.  Then I would need double 3s, 4s, 5s or 6s to win.

Of course, I could be missing something.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <14p8mgINNd51@early-bird.think.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!wizard
References: <1992Jul24.141201.24142@cbnewse.cb.att.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!wizard
From: wizard@think.com (Paul Gilberti)
Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon
Subject: Re: Mistake on 2nd Quiz
Date: 24 Jul 1992 15:47:28 GMT
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <14p8mgINNd51@early-bird.think.com>
References: <1992Jul24.141201.24142@cbnewse.cb.att.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gandalf.think.com