Article View: rec.games.computer.doom.misc
Article #6Re: Doom III is rubbish ! ! !
From: Jgarbuz
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 16:09
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 16:09
11 lines
1568 bytes
1568 bytes
"Karl-Hugo Weesberg" <netspider4@lycos.com> wrote in message news:7666ed5f.0410252204.6bb7f643@posting.google.com... > Doom 2 is much better !< I like Doom2 very much, and I do now have a copy of Doom 3, but can't run it until I invest some $250 or more to upgrade my machine. So, what is it you dislike about it? Is it dull, or too difficult or uninteresting, or what? Can you give a very brief review of why you don't recommend it? It might help me rethink about wasting all that money in a new video card and other upgrades that I would otherwise not need. Thanks!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1099238939.P0ZYI5REwvk+3K8NGXJl9w@teranews>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!hydra.nntpserver.com.POSTED!02a99d7f!not-for-mailReferences:
<7666ed5f.0410252204.6bb7f643@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f6832,57aef9a27f82db8b X-Google-Thread: f4f6f,57aef9a27f82db8b X-Google-Attributes: gidf6832,gidf4f6f,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!hydra.nntpserver.com.POSTED!02a99d7f!not-for-mail From: "Jgarbuz" <jgarbuz@netzero.com> Newsgroups: rec.games.computer.doom.misc,can.uucp References: <7666ed5f.0410252204.6bb7f643@posting.google.com> Subject: Re: Doom III is rubbish ! ! ! Lines: 13 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2162 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2162 NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 11:08:59 EST Message-ID: <1099238939.P0ZYI5REwvk+3K8NGXJl9w@teranews> X-Abuse-Report: http://www.usenetabuse.com X-Orginal-Message-ID: <v68hd.39144$bE3.30209@hydra.nntpserver.com> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 11:09:06 -0500