🚀 go-pugleaf

dalamb@qucis.queensu.ca (David Lamb) writes:

:
>view ambidexterity as having a range of values, eg. -20 to 0,
>representing how much of a percentage disadvantage you have with your
>off hand).

I also think that it should be relative to Agility. When Agility
increases the off-hand penalty decreases (ie the hand-eye coordination
develops.) Not an on-off -thing.

<Sorry, I lost your name> writes:

>>This means that generally stats should not have to do with such things as:
>>shape of body, attractiveness of character, presence or absence of some 
>>feature.  They should instead reflect what forces that entity can affect opun
>>their environment such as strength, understanding etc.

I agree on this. What we need is a broader, less-specific category above
the stat area.

-- 
               Juha Liukkonen, aka jliukkon@cc.helsinki.fi
            University of Helsinki, Dept. of Monkey Business
                                 --O--
           "Trust me, I know what I'm doing." - Sledge Hammer