Re: FUDGE suggestions (2 minor ones)

Article View: rec.games.design

Article #905

#905

From: Steffan O'Sullivan
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1993 22:29

20 lines
974 bytes

doane@ra.UCSC.EDU (Jay Doane) writes:
>
>It makes even more sense to me to number the levels like
>
>-3 Terrible
>-2 Poor
>-1 Mediocre
> 0 Fair
>+1 Good
>+2 Great
>+3 Superb
>
>This retains much of the symmetry of the FUDGE system.

This would be my first choice, too, except that Andy was using the
numbers for combat results - and working with negatives is harder than
working with purely positive numbers.

-- 
  - Steffan O'Sullivan		         sos@oz.plymouth.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Jan20.222918.531@oz.plymouth.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!oz.plymouth.edu!sos

References:

<1993Jan16.000713.6611@oz.plymouth.edu> <SKINNER.93Jan15223958@bear.stdavids.picker.com> <DOANE.93Jan20105816@ra.UCSC.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: rec.games.design
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!oz.plymouth.edu!sos
From: sos@oz.plymouth.edu (Steffan O'Sullivan)
Subject: Re: FUDGE suggestions (2 minor ones)
Message-ID: <1993Jan20.222918.531@oz.plymouth.edu>
Organization: Plymouth State College - Plymouth, NH.
References: <1993Jan16.000713.6611@oz.plymouth.edu> <SKINNER.93Jan15223958@bear.stdavids.picker.com> <DOANE.93Jan20105816@ra.UCSC.EDU>
Distribution: rec
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 93 22:29:18 GMT
Lines: 20

Reply to Parent Message