Article View: rec.games.programmer
Article #1158Re: Advice needed for fastest sort algorthm
From: Russ Trotter
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 16:10
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 16:10
15 lines
1053 bytes
1053 bytes
I hate to jump on this seemingly runaway train but.... In one of my classes, I remember the teacher saying that it had been proven that O(n log n) was the best one could do for _comparison_ based sorting... Is this a more correct assertion? I don't know much (at all :) ) about Radix sort (only how to spell it :) ) so I can't be sure if it disproves the statement above. I've seen posts flying back and forth about this and quite frankly I'm getting a bit confused... Russ asu@panther.mot.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov11.161052.5552@panther.mot.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!panther!panther4.panther.mot.com!asuReferences:
<BxG0MC.7yK@chinet.chi.il.us> <10991@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> <1992Nov11.043526.26732@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: rec.games.programmer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!panther!panther4.panther.mot.com!asu From: asu@panther4.panther.mot.com (Russ Trotter) Subject: Re: Advice needed for fastest sort algorthm Message-ID: <1992Nov11.161052.5552@panther.mot.com> Sender: usenet@panther.mot.com Nntp-Posting-Host: panther4.panther.mot.com Organization: Motorola Panther Project, Chandler, AZ References: <BxG0MC.7yK@chinet.chi.il.us> <10991@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> <1992Nov11.043526.26732@netcom.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 16:10:52 GMT Lines: 17