Re: TP or C ?

Article View: rec.games.programmer

Article #175

Back to rec.games.programmer Previous Next

#175

From: Markus Stumptner
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 14:24

11 lines
951 bytes

From article <BrwACJ.1sp@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, by tmkk@uiuc.edu (Khan):
> Take it as meaning your complaints about C have merit, as opposed to the
> complaints of those who just can't comprehend the semantics of the
> language. 

Wrong argument, since hard-to-grasp semantics are not a recommendation
for a language, if simpler languages with the same power exist.
-- 
Markus Stumptner                                mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
University of Technology Vienna                 vexpert!mst@relay.eu.net
Paniglg. 16, A-1040 Vienna, Austria             ...mcsun!vexpert!mst

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5623@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!email!vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at!mst

References: <BrwACJ.1sp@news.cso.uiuc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!email!vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at!mst
From: mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Markus Stumptner)
Newsgroups: rec.games.programmer
Subject: Re:   TP or C ?
Message-ID: <5623@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Date: 24 Jul 92 14:24:14 GMT
References: <BrwACJ.1sp@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
Organization: DB and ES Subdivision, TU Vienna
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message