Article View: rec.games.programmer
Article #1962Re: Should I learn C or C++ first?
From: Lawson English
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 1995 07:56
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 1995 07:56
24 lines
1735 bytes
1735 bytes
Dean Fogarty (c9228759@lily.newcastle.edu.au) wrote:
: Jeff W. (psilocyn@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
: : I just got Borland C++ 4.51, and there's a few questions I have.
: : Should I learn C or C++ first? And, what benefits do they each have
: : over each other? I don't really know the differences between the two.
: I'd say learn C first. C++ uses C syntax as a base - it's a good idea
: to get an understanding of how C constructs work before going to C++.
: Encapsulation, information hiding etc are all great, but it's not much
: good if you don't have an understanding of what the basics are.
This is so topsy-turvy. Forget C and C++. Learn SmallTalk first so that
you have a firm grasp of OOP and THEN learn C/C++.
Principles of OO are FAR more important than details of data structures
and loops and so on.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lawson English __ __ ____ ___ ___ ____
english@primenet.com /__)/__) / / / / /_ /\ / /_ /
/ / \ / / / / /__ / \/ /___ /
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<40f2gb$j0o@nnrp1.primenet.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.primenet.com!englishReferences:
<3v6qkj$8ak@news1.best.com> <3v713f$2bd@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> <408rnk$auj@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.primenet.com!english From: english@primenet.com (Lawson English) Newsgroups: rec.games.programmer,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: Should I learn C or C++ first? Date: 11 Aug 1995 07:56:59 GMT Organization: Primenet (602)395-1010 Distribution: world Message-ID: <40f2gb$j0o@nnrp1.primenet.com> References: <3v6qkj$8ak@news1.best.com> <3v713f$2bd@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> <408rnk$auj@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: usr4.primenet.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]