Thread View: rec.games.programmer
8 messages
8 total messages
Started by Anthony Kanner
Sun, 03 Mar 1996 23:46
SURVEY!!
Author: Anthony Kanner
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 1996 23:46
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 1996 23:46
20 lines
919 bytes
919 bytes
Hello, I am doing a survey on what people think is better a) Borland C++ 5.0 b) Visual C++ 4.0 Results will be posted to my web page at : http://home.earthlink.net/~kanner/ Thanks to those who particapate!! - Anthony -- ---------------------------------------------------- pc/saturn/psx/snes/gameboy kanner@earthlink.net check out my web site at http://home.earthlink.net/~kanner/ ----------------------------------------------------
Re: SURVEY!!
Author: Takamoto Miura
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 00:30
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 00:30
6 lines
575 bytes
575 bytes
b) Visual C++ 4.0
Simply because it comes with MFC.
-Takamoto Miura
Re: SURVEY!!
Author: James McIninch
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 01:50
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 01:50
9 lines
679 bytes
679 bytes
Takamoto Miura (takamoto@ucla.edu) wrote: : b) Visual C++ 4.0 : Simply because it comes with MFC. As does Watcomm C++ : -Takamoto Miura
Re: SURVEY!!
Author: Takamoto Miura
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 03:26
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 03:26
8 lines
769 bytes
769 bytes
James McIninch wrote: > As does Watcomm C++ I know. I used to use Watcom. Watcom is a good compilar except that it kept crashing on my computer and they didn't have any student discount. Oh well... -Takamoto Miura
Re: SURVEY!!
Author: The Amorphous Mass
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 05:41
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 05:41
17 lines
1349 bytes
1349 bytes
On 4 Mar 1996, James McIninch wrote: > Takamoto Miura (takamoto@ucla.edu) wrote: > : b) Visual C++ 4.0 > > : Simply because it comes with MFC. > > As does Watcomm C++ As does MetroWerks CodeWarrior 8.0 (for Macintosh). You don't even need a PC to write MFC-employing, x86-native code. Why you would use MFC is another question entirely. :-) --James Robinson (robinson@cs.uiowa.edu -or- james-robinson@uiowa.edu) /* Indeed, C++ is a bit of an oddball of a language ... given the way that * * it requires private parts to be visible. This increases the strength of * * coupling dramatically... -- Dr. Rich Artym */
Re: SURVEY!!
Author: Scott McMahan - Softbase Systems
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 13:35
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 13:35
12 lines
829 bytes
829 bytes
Anthony Kanner (kanner@earthlink.net) wrote: : I am doing a survey on what people think is better : a) Borland C++ 5.0 : b) Visual C++ 4.0 Shouldn't you wait til BC++ 5 is actually released, and people have used it? :) The validity of your results could be questioned... Scott
Re: SURVEY!!
Author: Sean Klein
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 17:07
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 17:07
8 lines
1001 bytes
1001 bytes
Takamoto Miura wrote: > I know. I used to use Watcom. Watcom is a good compilar except that it kept crashing on > my computer and they didn't have any student discount. Oh well... Watcom does have a student discount. It's only available direct from Watcom. They sell the entire package for $99 through the mail if you have a student or university ID card. Check out the Watcom web page for details.
Re: SURVEY!!
Author: Justin Rudd
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1996 16:03
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1996 16:03
11 lines
689 bytes
689 bytes
>I am doing a survey on what people think is better >a) Borland C++ 5.0 >b) Visual C++ 4.0 B because MFC is completely portable to any other architecture that Windows NT will work on. Justin Rudd rudd@mindspring.com "It'll work...trust me"
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads