Article View: rec.guns
Article #7887Re: Glock vs. Sig!?
From: MDCRUMR Crumrine
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 03:38
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 03:38
37 lines
1882 bytes
1882 bytes
In article <9301250428.AA28006@zippy.cs.UMD.EDU> kgk@martigny.ai.mit.edu (Kleanthes Koniaris) writes: # #Dear Readers: # #I have an old Glock 17 (which I bought in 1986), with 1992 Trijicon #sights. While I *love* my Glock, I am thinking of a second pistol; #perhaps a collection of one pistol is too small, and our beloved #Moderator's mantra is taking its toll (``Buy them all'' :). # #Anyway, given all of the "Sig, Sig, Sig," talk that I hear, I was #considering a Sig P226 with K-kote and Sig-lights (Sig's tritium #sights [which are also from Trijicon?]), in 9mm. But then, in a #moment of lucid thought, I realized that for the price of a Sig, I #could almost get two Glocks. # #The natural question comes to mind, is the Sig better than the Glock? #If so, why? [stuff deleted] #So, Sig owners, please be so kind as to post *why* the Sig is so good, #and please be so kind, if possible, as to *compare* to the Glock. # # ---kleanthes # # # I have owned the blued 226 since 1987 with 6000+ rounds thru it. Now, I'm not the most meticulous when it comes to cleaning right after a session, somtimes I wait 2 days, somtimes 2 weeks, if the session was light (and I used factory ammo :) I skip until the next time. The point is, this gun looks and shoots as good as the day I brought it, which is to say _very_ good! Mike Crumrine crumrine@erenj.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan26.191223.8943@erenj.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!erenj.comShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!erenj.com From: crumrine@erenj.com (MDCRUMR Crumrine) Newsgroups: rec.guns Subject: Re: Glock vs. Sig!? Message-ID: <1993Jan26.191223.8943@erenj.com> Date: 27 Jan 93 03:38:25 GMT Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu Organization: Exxon Research and Engineering, NJ Lines: 39 Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu