Article View: rec.guns
Article #7894Re: Why ?
From: James P. Callison
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 03:38
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 03:38
40 lines
2535 bytes
2535 bytes
In article <19609@smoke.brl.mil> gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes: # #In article <28549@sybase.sybase.com> mtxinu!sybase.sybase.com!thorick@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (Thorick Chow) writes: ##WHy is it that many pistol target shooters put their non-shooting ##hand in their pockets ? # #It seems like a good place to put it. TV technicians working around #high voltage keep one hand tucked into the belt behind their backs.. # #I think your real question is, why are they shooting one-handed? #That must be because the official rules of their particular competition #require it. Of course for defense shooting one uses both hands by #preference. # #[MODERATOR: Another consideration. Folks with a, hmmm, curvaceous #figure like mine tend to be front heavy. Standing with one's arm #straight out holding a few pounds of pistol can further throw off #one's center of gravity. Anything to get my weight off on the other #side for counterbalance is desirable.... (for precise balancing I #suppose I should stuff a couple of pizzas in a backpack....)] It's a shooting (stance) style. I was at the range when a couple of guys came in to shoot a Glock .40, and that was the "style" they used. The security patrol guy stopped in, and he commented on it; he told me the name of it, but I can't remember what it was. It seems like it's a German style, but I may be confusing that with the comments about how their full-length leather coats made them look like Gestapo agents. :-) Their groups weren't bad, considering the pistol they were using ;-), but it wasn't competition quality. James James P. Callison Microcomputer Coordinator OU Law Library Callison@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu /\ Callison@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu constellation!biglaw!callison@mailhost.ecn.uoknor.edu DISCLAIMER: I'm not an engineer, but I play one at work... "God didn't make men and women equal. Colonel Colt did." --Maggie Zombro, "Reasonable Doubts"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C1H746.AA@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!kittyhawk.ecn.uoknor.eduShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!kittyhawk.ecn.uoknor.edu From: callison@kittyhawk.ecn.uoknor.edu (James P. Callison) Newsgroups: rec.guns Subject: Re: Why ? Message-ID: <C1H746.AA@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> Date: 27 Jan 93 03:38:34 GMT Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu Organization: Engineering Computer Network, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA Lines: 42 Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu