Article View: rec.guns
Article #7922Re: accuracy of .40s&w vs. 9mm
From: Emmanuel Baechler
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 14:09
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 14:09
39 lines
2496 bytes
2496 bytes
# I saw an article and thought "whatta stupid gun!" The promotion I saw # was in the Nov 92 Hand Gunning. The thing weighs 43 oz empty: 4 oz # more than a 1911A1, & 20 oz more than a Glock. Not too impressive for # something designed to be a "compact". For some reason, the vels # seemed pretty low also, maybe the gas delayed blowback? Either that # or the "factory vel ratings" for .40 are unrealistically high: I have seen an explanation for this added weight, which, IMHO, makes a lot of sense. .40S&W ammo are extremely fast to burn. This is why the slide and the barrel start to recoil even before the firing pin has gone back to its original position. This explains the vertical marks on the primer of the delayed blowbacks .40. This also explains their lack of accuracy: the barrel has significantly moved, even before the bullet has gone out. I guess that there is only two easy ways to cure this. Either you make the slide much heavier, to slow its motion down, or you use a much stronger recoil spring. Of course you can use a balance of both. It appears that this is what HK did. The result is a very heavy and not so compact gun, but it is also extremely accurate, very stable during the fire and the recoil of the slide is mauch smaller than the ones of other mechanisms. If you can live with this added weight, these advantages are, IMHO, worth the problems they create. # The looks are not too keen either: It kind of reminds me of a # fancy version of those cast zinc Stallard Arms blowback .40s. For # 1200 bucks you'd expect HK to sharpen it up a little. Here, I entirely disagree. The HK is one of the best made pistol, and I appreiate a lot its look. Emmanuel Baechler. | Tel.: ++41-21-693-2732 Laboratoire d'Intelligence Artificielle | e-mail: baechler@lia.di.epfl.ch Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne | or: baechler@liasun6.epfl.ch MA-Ecublens | Standard Disclaimer CH-1015 Lausanne Switzerland Ban the bomb. Save the world for conventional warfare.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<m0nBheG-0008QtC@liasun6.epfl.ch>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!nsisrv!mimsy!lia.di.epfl.chShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!nsisrv!mimsy!lia.di.epfl.ch From: baechler@lia.di.epfl.ch (Emmanuel Baechler) Newsgroups: rec.guns Subject: Re: accuracy of .40s&w vs. 9mm Message-ID: <m0nBheG-0008QtC@liasun6.epfl.ch> Date: 12 Jan 93 14:09:27 GMT Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu Lines: 40 Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu