Article View: rec.guns
Article #7936Re: the spirit of rec.guns
From: webdw
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 04:15
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 04:15
21 lines
1169 bytes
1169 bytes
In article <9301252007.aa21687@claudius.pica.army.mil> erudnick@pica.army.mil (FSAC-SID) writes: # #gus Baird writes: ##For simplicity, clarity, and a little nostalgia, "army rifles"? # #Unfortunately, this fits right in with NJ Governor Florio's "weapons of #war" BS. As in "legitimate sportsmen don't need _____________..." # #I kinda like defense rifles: The selective fire guns are "assault rifles", #while the semi-only are "defense rifles". Or something like that? # Actually, some commonsense terms already exist: For semi-automatic military rifles- battle rifle or carbine (dependent on barrel length) For select fire military rifles capable of burst or full auto- assualt rifle, carbine or pistol (dependent on barrel length) BDW
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan27.172638.731@cbnews.cb.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!sdd.hp.com!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!mvutd.att.com!webdwShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!sdd.hp.com!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!mvutd.att.com!webdw From: webdw@mvutd.att.com Newsgroups: rec.guns Subject: Re: the spirit of rec.guns Message-ID: <1993Jan27.172638.731@cbnews.cb.att.com> Date: 28 Jan 93 04:15:46 GMT Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu Organization: AT&T Lines: 22 Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu