Article View: rec.guns
Article #7963Re: Glock vs. Sig!?
From: Holger Reusch (Dipl. Gerhard + J...
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 04:16
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 04:16
22 lines
1587 bytes
1587 bytes
gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes: #In article <1993Jan25.200540.3372@email.tuwien.ac.at> holger@vmars.tuwien.ac.at (Holger Reusch (Dipl. Gerhard + Joe)) writes: ##- In case of misfire, the Glock trigger can't be pulled again ## without racking the slide. Same situation as with SA pistols. ## With the SIG I have the additional option of pulling the ## trigger again. #But one could alternatively say that with a Glock one doesn't even #THINK about wasting time pulling the trigger repeatedly when it isn't #going to help anyway.. Point well taken. Especially with 15+ rounds per magazine doing the tap-rack-bang immediately is certainly the more sensible way to handle a misfire. In that case a single maybe-ok cartridge is a small price for a new one. Especially for defense purposes, it's not optimal to keep pulling. -- | Holger Reusch | | Technical University of Vienna, Austria <-+--- No kangaroos here, | Dept. for Real-Time Systems | sorry! | holger@vmars.tuwien.ac.at |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan27.190539.15035@email.tuwien.ac.at>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!ra!mimsy!vmars.tuwien.ac.atShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!ra!mimsy!vmars.tuwien.ac.at From: holger@vmars.tuwien.ac.at (Holger Reusch (Dipl. Gerhard + Joe)) Newsgroups: rec.guns Subject: Re: Glock vs. Sig!? Message-ID: <1993Jan27.190539.15035@email.tuwien.ac.at> Date: 28 Jan 93 04:16:02 GMT Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu Organization: Technical University Vienna, Dept. for Realtime Systems, AUSTRIA Lines: 23 Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu