Article View: rec.guns
Article #7987Re: Glock 10mm and CHP
From: James P. Callison
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 04:15
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 04:15
23 lines
1606 bytes
1606 bytes
In article <MAILQUEUE-101.930126081318.288@english.as.ua.edu> DHORTON@ENGLISH.AS.UA.EDU (David A. Horton) writes: #I also have the feeling the test was slanted in favor for the S&W. #After all, one of the requirements for pistol selection was ease of #take-down in the field and requiring no tools. Heck, what's easier #than a Glock?? Even in the dark?? How 'bout a Beretta ;-) #And the CHP had stringent deadlines #for submitting pistols for evaluation. Made things kinda' hard for #Glock and Colt. And the 40 had only been around for a few months. If they decided to go with the .40, it should've been obvious who they wanted; look at the name of the round-- .40 Smith & Wesson.... ;-) James James P. Callison Microcomputer Coordinator OU Law Library Callison@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu /\ Callison@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu constellation!biglaw!callison@mailhost.ecn.uoknor.edu DISCLAIMER: I'm not an engineer, but I play one at work... "God didn't make men and women equal. Colonel Colt did." --Maggie Zombro, "Reasonable Doubts"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C1Iso8.JIM@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!kittyhawk.ecn.uoknor.eduShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!kittyhawk.ecn.uoknor.edu From: callison@kittyhawk.ecn.uoknor.edu (James P. Callison) Newsgroups: rec.guns Subject: Re: Glock 10mm and CHP Message-ID: <C1Iso8.JIM@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> Date: 28 Jan 93 04:15:20 GMT Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu Organization: Engineering Computer Network, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA Lines: 25 Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu