Article View: rec.guns
Article #8008Re: home protection concerns
From: T. Archer
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 04:15
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 04:15
48 lines
3191 bytes
3191 bytes
In article <C1H50s.Mqn@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> callison@kittyhawk.ecn.uoknor.edu (James P. Callison) writes: #Who said anything about death and destruction? We're talking about a simple #hobby, where there is no criminal intent. And _that_ is what your #character witnesses can testify to. Paper punching is a legitimate, #recognized sport, with governing bodies--hell, it's an Olympic sport! #It's also sanctioned by the US Government--ever heard of DCM competitions? #(OK, so the DCM competitions are designed to ensure that we have soldiers #who can hit their targets if we're ever in such dire straits as to need #them, but it's still a sport, and it still doesn't involve "death and #destruction." How many DCM shooters actually plan to wind up taking shots #at other people?) Sure. I know that. You know that. David, the programmer in the next office over knows that. But if you get a procescutor with an animosity toward legitimate means of self-defense, and you watch you iterest in shooting sports get painted up as a "morbid facination... etc. ad nauseum." We need more shooters on juries. We need more safe, informed shooters, period. ###But you're right; we know better, and we're not the jury--although, by ###rights, a handloader should be tried by people who actually understand ###handloading and shooting. You know, that "jury of your peers" stuff... ## ##This is a mis-conception. You are not entitled to a "jury of your peers" ##over here, but a jury of "12 good men and true." A jury of your "peers" is ##a phrase from english common law meaning that peasants would not wind up ##haveing to judge nobles and nobles wouldn't get to judge peasants. # #Nowhere does the constitution say that you're entitled to any number #of jurors. It says that you are entitled to "a speedy and public #trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the #crime shall have been committed," and a few other things about the #actual process. It can be argued that a jury which is ignorant of #the facts re: handloading and shooting do not constitute an impartial #jury, but this is neither the time, nor the venue for such arguments... Yep. Mea culpa. I was trying to address the "of you peers" business, and I overstepped my knowledge. Lo siento. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= E-Mail to PA142548@utkvm1.utk.edu, mail to ARCHER at that address will bounce. "Don't blame me, I voted Libertarian." =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= [MODERATOR: I'd like to see this migrate elsewhere now that we are getting so much more into legalisms, etc. Thanks]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<PA142548.886.728158642@utkvm1.utk.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!ra!mimsy!utkvm1.utk.eduShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!ra!mimsy!utkvm1.utk.edu From: PA142548@utkvm1.utk.edu (T. Archer) Newsgroups: rec.guns Subject: Re: home protection concerns Message-ID: <PA142548.886.728158642@utkvm1.utk.edu> Date: 28 Jan 93 04:15:56 GMT Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu Organization: University of Tennessee Lines: 48 Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu