🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: rec.guns
Article #8028

Re: Glock Defense (Re: Glock vs. SIG!?)

#8028
From: FSAC-SID
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 04:16
39 lines
1816 bytes

James P. Callison writes:
#Who's frothing? I am now, and was then, perfectly rational. Glocks are
#decent guns, and I really do like them, but they are not, IMHO, in the
#same class overall as the SIGs. That's my opinion, get yer own.

Well put. In terms of value and overall suitability for use as a service
handgun, the Glocks are in a class above the SIGs.


##It seems you've compared your SIG to farm equipment...interesting.  I'm a
#
#No, I didn't. I was using the example to show that welds are not necessarily
#a "Bad Thing"(tm pending).

True, but but welds and steel stampings are definitely a "low cost" thing,
like the molded plastic frame of the Glock, which is not reflected in the
excessive price of the SIG.


#Also try demand, supply, and importing fees.

Funny that only SIG-Sauer seems to have these problems.


#Citation: _SIGARMS_Quarterly_, "100m Hits with the P226", Vol. 4, Summer,1992.

Definitely an unbiased source for SIG information.


All in fun, with beaucoup :)s, SIG-Sauer fans. This will be my last posting,
as some SIG fans are humorless, and have let me know via E-mail.


Ed Rudnicki     erudnick@pica.army.mil     All disclaimers apply
Protect the Second Amendment - boycott Ruger products
Geordi: "...it's like the laws of physics went right out the
window." Q: "And why shouldn't they? They're so inconvenient."
Technical Details
Message-ID: <9301271707.aa11081@claudius.pica.army.mil>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!ra!mimsy!pica.army.mil

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!ra!mimsy!pica.army.mil
From: erudnick@pica.army.mil (FSAC-SID)
Newsgroups: rec.guns
Subject: Re: Glock Defense (Re: Glock vs. SIG!?)
Message-ID: <9301271707.aa11081@claudius.pica.army.mil>
Date: 28 Jan 93 04:16:48 GMT
Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu
Lines: 40
Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu