Article View: rec.guns
Article #8034Re: Glock Defense (Re: Glock vs. SIG!?)
From: David C Winters
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 04:17
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 04:17
27 lines
1630 bytes
1630 bytes
In article <93026.224321U28037@uicvm.uic.edu> U28037%uicvm.uic.edu@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU (Jason Kratz) writes: #In article <4380@eastman.UUCP>, (MJ) says: ##I think the following is the bottom line between the two guns: ## ##1) Many will not be able to get by the cost of the SIG. ##2) Many will not get by the trigger of the Glock. ##3) Many will not get by the looks of the Glock. ## ##MJ #Maybe I am the only person on here who doesn't think this way. I think the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ #Glock looks REALLY cool. I guess Hollywood likes them too cause I've seen #them in several movies. The other thing that totally amazes me about the Glock #is how light it is. That's just my opinion tho...... #Jason Kratz Nope. I second the opinon. Especially when it's been outfitted with the Applied Laser Systems (I think thats the manufacturer) mini-laser sight. Except for the sticker they slap on the side of the slide. The Glocks' weight didn't really register until I saw that the 21's are only 2.something ounces heavier than Smith & Wesson's 9mm 39xx series... -- David Winters winters@vms.cis.pitt.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2669@blue.cis.pitt.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!ra!mimsy!pitt.eduShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!ra!mimsy!pitt.edu From: dcwst8+@pitt.edu (David C Winters) Newsgroups: rec.guns Subject: Re: Glock Defense (Re: Glock vs. SIG!?) Message-ID: <2669@blue.cis.pitt.edu> Date: 28 Jan 93 04:17:04 GMT Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu Organization: University of Pittsburgh Lines: 28 Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu